PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 16, 2026Advances in Cement Research0 citations

Interlayer bonding testing fixture for 3D-printed TJC-1 lunar regolith simulant geopolymer

View Full Paper
JHJiajun HuTongji UniversityKYKequan YuTongji UniversityXGXiaolu GuoTongji University

Key Points

  • The study aims to propose a new fixture method for testing interlayer bonding in 3D-printed geopolymers, particularly using TJC-1 lunar regolith.
  • Introduced a newly designed fixture method (N-FM) for testing interlayer bonding strength.
  • Compared performance of N-FM with traditional adherence method (T-AM).
  • Evaluated failure modes and bonding strength accuracy after 28 days.
  • N-FM improved the success rate of bonding tests from 50% (T-AM) to 90%.
  • Interlayer bonding strength measured at 2.16 MPa with N-FM, 30.91% higher than T-AM.
  • Observed distinct failure modes: interlayer and diagonal failures for N-FM, while T-AM showed interlayer and intralayer failures.

Abstract

The traditional interlayer bonding testing methods used for cement-based materials is not suitable for three-dimensional (3D)-printed geopolymers and they have some drawbacks that prevent efficient and accurate testing; accordingly there is an urgent need for a new testing method. In this briefing article, a newly designed fixture method (N-FM) was proposed to test the interlayer bonding strength of a 3D-printed geopolymer made from TJC-1 lunar regolith simulant as a case to show the improvement from the previously used traditional adherence method (T-AM). The results show that these two methods exhibit different failure modes. Interlayer failure, intralayer failure and epoxy resin detaching can be observed from the T-AM, while interlayer failure and diagonal failure can be observed from the N-FM. Compared to 50% by the T-AM, the success rate can be improved up to 90% by the N-FM and the distribution of data is more uniform. The 28-day interlayer bonding strength result from the N-FM was 2.16 MPa, which is considered to be more accurate, and is 30.91% higher than that of the T-AM.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69926503eb1f82dc367a0e67https://doi.org/10.1680/jadcr.25.00212
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper