PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 16, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Impact Of Government Subsidies On Farmers In India

View Full Paper
ASAnkita Kailas ShelkaKKKamlesh Kumar

Key Points

  • Examine the effects of government subsidies on farmers in India, focusing on economic and resource outcomes.
  • Analysis of major subsidy channels including input, risk, price support, and transfer-type subsidies.
  • Construction of a conceptual framework based on subsidy characteristics and farmer responses.
  • Review of peer-reviewed findings on subsidy impact on outcomes like yields, profits, and environmental effects.
  • Subsidies generally increase adoption and short-run production but vary based on farm size and irrigation access.
  • Regressive incidence observed, with benefits tied to land ownership and access to resources.
  • Redesign of subsidies can improve efficiency and decrease ecological impacts.

Abstract

The central tool of agricultural policy in India is the government subsidies that aim to stabilize the farm incomes, promote the uptake of technology, minimize agricultural risk and enhance food security. However, subsidies also have a tendency to pervert the input decisions, increase disparities between irrigated and rainfed areas, and hasten environmental pressure, in particular, groundwater drainage and nutrient unequal distribution. This paper summarizes the peer-reviewed findings on the role of major subsidy channels (i.e. input subsidies (fertilizer, power, irrigation equipment and mechanization), (ii) risk subsidies (public procurement/price incentives: crop insurance premium support), (iii) price support (crop insurance premium support), and (iv) transfer-type subsidies (direct benefit transfers and targeted rebates) in influencing the outcomes of farmers in India. The paper builds a cohesive conceptual framework based on the characteristics of subsidy design (targeting, conditionality, delivery mechanism) and the farmer response (input intensity, crop choice, investment and risk management) and subsequently to economic outcomes (yields, profits and volatility) and resource outcomes (water extraction, soil health and emissions). The synthesis suggests that subsidies tend to increase adoption and short-run production, although the effect depends largely on the farm size, access to irrigation, and market connectivity. Regressive incidence is typical where the benefits are proportional to land, pump ownership or access to procurement. It has also been demonstrated that redesign, the shift of price distortion to medium-specific, meter-specific, or performance-specific incentives can maintain welfare of farmers and decrease fiscal and ecological expenses. Implications on policy include (1) improved targeting at smallholders and susceptible areas, (2) moving to output-based subsidies instead of open-ended input price subsidies (efficiency, resilience) and (3) combining water-energy governance with subsidy institution.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shelka et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69926552eb1f82dc367a1392https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18641382
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Irrigation Subsidies in India: Balancing Farmer Welfare and Environmental Sustainability2025
  2. 2Irrigation Subsidies in India: Balancing Farmer Welfare and Environmental Sustainability2025
  3. 3Overview of Agricultural Subsidies in India and Its Impact on Environment2024 · 6 citations
  4. 4The role of farm subsidies in changing India’s water footprint2024 · 19 citations
  5. 5Assessing the Impact of Agricultural Subsidies on farm Profitability and Sustainability2024 · 8 citations