PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 16, 2026Bone Marrow Transplantation1 citations

CAR T-cell therapy in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

View Full Paper
VNV. NavarroVall d'Hebron Institut de RecercaGIGloria IacoboniHebron UniversitySCSergi CamarillasVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari

Key Points

  • To compare the efficacy and safety of different CAR T-cell constructs in treating relapsed/refractory B-ALL.
  • Conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 40 clinical trials.
  • Included a total of 1540 R/R B-ALL patients.
  • Assessed impact of demographics, prior treatments, and construct characteristics on outcomes.
  • Pooled complete remission rate was 83.4%.
  • Minimal residual disease-negative complete remission rate was 92.7%.
  • 4-1BB constructs had higher MRDneg-CR/CRi rates compared to CD28 constructs (94.0% vs 84.4%, p = 0.048).

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment landscape of relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), with high remission rates across various CAR T-cell constructs. However, the durability of these responses remains a major challenge, with many patients experiencing relapse after an initial remission. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of different CAR T-cell constructs across 40 clinical trials, including a total of 1540 R/R B-ALL patients. We assessed the impact of patient demographics, prior treatment exposure, and construct characteristics on treatment outcomes. The pooled complete remission rate (CRR) was 83.4% ( I 2 = 49%), with a minimal residual disease-negative complete remission (MRDneg-CR/CRi) rate of 92.7% ( I 2 = 48%). 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain constructs showed higher MRDneg-CR/CRi rates compared with CD28 (94.0% vs. 84.4% p = 0.048) and a lower incidence of immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. Additionally, CAR T-cell products targeting CD19 or CD19/CD22 patients presented higher MRDneg-CR/CRi rates than those targeting CD22 alone. In conclusion, our findings suggest that 4-1BB-based CAR T-cell therapy targeting CD19 offers the best efficacy and safety profile in R/R B-ALL.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Navarro et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69926a620d0ce0adc9976a45https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-026-02803-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia with the second generation of CD 19 CAR ‐T containing either CD 28 or 4‐1 BB2018 · 76 citations
  2. 2Advanced methods in meta‐analysis: multivariate approach and meta‐regression2002 · 1,596 citations
  3. 3The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews2021 · 103,986 citations
  4. 4Factors associated with the clinical outcome of patients with relapsed/refractory CD19+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with ARI-0001 CART19-cell therapy2021 · 27 citations
  5. 5Impact of disease burden and late loss of B cell aplasia on the risk of relapse after CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T Cell (Tisagenlecleucel) infusion in pediatric and young adult patients with relapse/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: role of B-cell monitoring2024 · 23 citations