PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026Communications Medicine1 citationsOpen Access

Homologous recombination deficiency in primary ER-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer

HDHelen R. DaviesDBDaniella BlackAKAnders Kvist

Key Points

  • The study aims to investigate the prevalence and clinical impact of homologous recombination deficiency in ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer.
  • Analyzed 502 ER-positive HER2-negative tumors using whole genome sequencing.
  • Defined homologous recombination deficiency using mutational signature analysis.
  • Assessed transcriptional, DNA methylation, and clinicopathological data.
  • HRD was found in 8.4% of ER-positive HER2-negative cancers, much less than triple-negative cancers.
  • Common genetic/epigenetic mechanisms affecting BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51C, and PALB2 were identified.
  • HRD tumors did not show a distinct transcriptional or DNA methylation profile compared to HR-proficient tumors.
  • A non-significant trend suggested poorer outcomes for patients with HRD tumors not treated with chemotherapy.

Abstract

Abstract Background Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) originating from inactivation of genes like BRCA1 / BRCA2 is a targetable abnormality common in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). In estrogen-receptor (ER)-positive HER2-negative (ERpHER2n) breast cancer (BC), HRD prevalence and clinical impact are unclear. Methods We analyzed 502 ERpHER2n tumors from patients recruited via the population-representative Swedish SCAN-B study by whole genome sequencing (WGS), defining mutational signatures-based HRD, as well as matched transcriptional, DNA methylation, clinicopathological, adjuvant treatment, and outcome data. Results We show that HRD is much less frequent in ERpHER2n BC (8.4%) compared to TNBC, though induced by similar genetic/epigenetic mechanisms acting on mainly BRCA1 / BRCA2 / RAD51C / PALB2 together, providing a plausible HR-inactivation mechanism for 71.4% of HRD tumors. Our modelled estimate of HRD in Western European/Nordic BC is ~10-13%. HRD tumors were observed across all PAM50 gene expression subtypes with the exception of Luminal A tumors ( < 1%) and did not exhibit a unique, defining transcriptional or DNA methylation profile. While HRD status was not statistically associated with differences in patient outcome for patients treated with combined chemotherapy and endocrine therapy, a nonsignificant trend of poorer outcome for patients with HRD tumors was observed for patients treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy only. Conclusions ERpHER2n HRD tumors show features of aggressive disease, but do not display a distinct transcriptional or DNA methylation profile that clearly differentiates them from HR-proficient tumors. Though numbers are limited, we present early evidence that HRD stratification by WGS could impact therapeutic strategies, as HRD BCs trended to poorer outcomes when not treated with chemotherapy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Davies et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a7a5ecb39a600b3ed7d4https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-026-01385-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper