PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics0 citationsOpen Access

Luteal-phase deficiency and diminished ovarian reserve: a narrative review of interactions and clinical implications

CZChaoliang ZhangMGMingxia Gao

Key Points

  • The aim is to investigate the interplay between diminished ovarian reserve and luteal phase deficiency, examining clinical and molecular insights.
  • Conducted a narrative review integrating epidemiological data and clinical practices.
  • Analyzed molecular mechanisms and signaling pathways impacting reproductive health.
  • Proposed a hypothesis regarding the roles of luteal phase deficiency in exacerbating diminished ovarian reserve.
  • Observed a potential pathophysiological link between diminished ovarian reserve and luteal phase deficiency.
  • Suggested that luteal phase support therapy could enhance both ovarian and systemic endocrine health.
  • Highlighted the role of progesterone in regulating the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis.

Abstract

Diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) and luteal phase defect (LPD) are common endocrine disorders affecting the fertility of women of reproductive age. Traditionally, these conditions have been considered and treated independently. However, clinical observations frequently reveal that patients with DOR also exhibit features of LPD, suggesting a potential pathophysiological link between them. This review aims to explore the interplay between DOR and LPD from a novel perspective by integrating epidemiological data, current diagnostic and therapeutic practices, and recent insights into molecular mechanisms. Special emphasis is placed on the role of hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis dysfunction, oxidative stress-inflammatory microenvironment imbalance, and key signaling pathways, such as PI3K/Akt/mTOR, in mediating their interaction. We propose a central hypothesis: LPD may not merely be a complication of DOR; rather, intrinsic features of LPD-such as insufficient or prematurely withdrawn progesterone secretion-may exert negative feedback on the HPG axis and exacerbate oxidative damage within the ovarian microenvironment, thereby actively contributing to the onset or progression of DOR. Based on this hypothesis, we further suggest that treating LPD-particularly through luteal phase support therapy-may have benefits beyond improving endometrial receptivity. Such interventions could potentially modulate the endocrine milieu at both the systemic and local ovarian levels, thereby playing a role in managing DOR and possibly improving antral follicle count (AFC). These insights open up new directions for future therapeutic strategies targeting DOR.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a7b5ecb39a600b3ed95ahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-025-08280-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper