PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026The Journal of Creative Behavior1 citationsOpen Access

The PISA 2022 Creative Thinking Assessment: A Welcome Opportunity to Explore the Mechanics of Flexibility Scoring

View Full Paper
BFBoris Forthmann

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate and improve flexibility scoring methods in the PISA Creative Thinking Assessment.
  • Analyzed existing scoring systems for flexibility based on linguistic diversity and category systems.
  • Applied general diversity measure frameworks to redefine flexibility scoring.
  • Provided an empirical example illustrating the application of diversity scores.
  • Identified limitations of current flexibility scoring methods.
  • Demonstrated that diversity scores could better differentiate response patterns among test-takers.

Abstract

ABSTRACT The PISA 2022 Creative Thinking Assessment measures the ability to generate diverse ideas, that is, flexibility. However, since test‐takers only provide up to three responses, scoring flexibility is challenging. Employed scoring systems rely on dimensions such as linguistic diversity or category systems to quantify how dissimilar a test‐taker's responses are. In this work, I will revisit the flexibility scoring in the PISA 2022 Creative Thinking Assessment from the perspective of general diversity measure frameworks, which distinguish variety, balance, and disparity, in the hope of identifying ways to gain more information on test‐takers' performances. An empirical illustration demonstrates the potential of diversity scores to better differentiate between different response patterns.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Boris Forthmann (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a7b5ecb39a600b3edb34https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.70103
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Measurement of Diversity1949 · 14,297 citations
  2. 2Understanding the confounding effect of fluency in divergent thinking scores: Revisiting average scores to quantify artifactual correlation.2018 · 142 citations
  3. 3Divergent thinking: New methods, recent research, and extended theory.2019 · 246 citations
  4. 4PISA 2022 Assessment and Analytical Framework2023 · 303 citations
  5. 5Updated science-wide author databases of standardized citation indicators2020 · 237 citations