PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports3 citationsOpen Access

Neurocognitive and Autonomic Signatures of Performance Under Motivational Stress: An Integrated Psychophysiological Analysis of Reward and Punishment in Shooting Performance

View Full Paper
MCMing‐Yang ChengInstitute of Sports Medicine and ScienceKWKuo‐Pin WangTHTsung‐Min HungNational Taiwan Normal University

Key Points

  • The aim is to understand how motivational contexts of reward and punishment impact performance under pressure.
  • Used a within-subject design with elite marksmen performing a simulated shooting task.
  • Examined neurophysiological markers in four domains: affective regulation, cognitive control, motor readiness, and autonomic flexibility.
  • Conditions included reward, punishment, and neutral to compare effects.
  • Reward framing improved performance by increasing brain-body coordination and emotional control.
  • Punishment caused heightened error sensitivity and disrupted communication in the brain.
  • Findings indicate that these motivational factors can recalibrate neurocognitive and autonomic systems, affecting performance outcomes.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Motivational framing—such as reward and punishment—critically shapes performance under pressure, yet the underlying neurocognitive and autonomic mechanisms remain unclear. Guided by the cognitive–affective–motor (CAM) model and psychomotor efficiency theory (PET), this study examined how motivational context modulates brain–body dynamics during high‐pressure precision performance. Using a within‐subject design, elite marksmen performed a simulated shooting task under reward, punishment, and neutral conditions. Neurophysiological markers were assessed across four domains: affective regulation (frontal alpha asymmetry FAA, eyeblink startle EBS), cognitive control (feedback‐related negativity fERN, frontal midline theta), motor readiness (sensorimotor rhythm SMR, fronto‐temporal coherence), and autonomic flexibility (heart rate variability HRV). Reward framing elicited a coordinated brain–body state marked by elevated SMR and HRV, greater left‐frontal activation, and reduced fERN and coherence—supporting focus, emotional control, and movement stability. Punishment elicited defensive arousal, heightened error sensitivity, and disrupted cortical communication, particularly in lower performers. These results demonstrate that motivational incentives recalibrate neurocognitive and autonomic systems, shaping performance resilience or vulnerability. The identified markers represent viable targets for neurofeedback and biofeedback interventions aimed at enhancing resilience, attentional control, and execution in elite sport performance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cheng et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a7ffecb39a600b3ee4b2https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.70227
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper