PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026The Oncologist1 citationsOpen Access

Outcomes after SRS and Ipilimumab plus Nivolumab for Melanoma Brain Metastases Following Prior Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor or Targeted Therapy

View Full Paper
IMIan MessingLLLauren LinkowskiMRMatthew D Riina

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of melanoma brain metastases treated with SRS and concurrent ipi/nivo, particularly the effect of prior therapies.
  • Retrospective analysis of 68 patients with 413 melanoma brain metastases.
  • Evaluation of overall survival and intracranial progression-free survival as primary endpoints.
  • Assessment of factors influencing outcomes using univariable and multivariable Cox models.
  • Median overall survival was 24.0 months, with 12- and 24-month survival rates of 64% and 50%, respectively.
  • Patients naive to immune checkpoint inhibitors had longer overall survival compared to those treated prior (50.5 vs 17.6 months).
  • Presence of prior ICI and targeted therapy predicted poorer outcomes.

Abstract

Abstract Background Melanoma brain metastases (BM) carry high morbidity and mortality despite advances in systemic therapy. Combined immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) with ipilimumab and nivolumab (ipi/nivo) demonstrates intracranial activity, but the influence of prior systemic therapy exposure is poorly defined. This is the first real-world study evaluating outcomes of melanoma BM treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and concurrent ipi/nivo, focusing on the impact of prior ICI or targeted therapy. Patients and Methods We retrospectively analyzed 68 patients with 413 melanoma BM treated with concurrent SRS and ipi/nivo from 2015–2025. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS). Secondary endpoints included local and distant control, radionecrosis, and leptomeningeal disease. Univariable and multivariable Cox models identified predictors of outcome. Results Median OS was 24.0 months (12- and 24-month OS: 64% and 50%). ICI-naive patients had longer OS (50.5 vs 17.6 months; P = .007) and iPFS (15.1 vs 5.9 months) than those with prior ICI. On multivariable analysis, prior ICI (HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.13–4.41), prior BRAF/MEKi (HR 2.26, 95% CI 1.01–5.04), and ≥11 SRS-treated lesions (HR 3.22, 95% CI 1.43–7.21) predicted worse outcomes, while higher Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) favored OS (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.29–0.75). At 24 months, local progression was 11%, distant 49%, radionecrosis 7%, and leptomeningeal disease 4%. Conclusion Concurrent SRS with ipi/nivo provides durable intracranial control with low toxicity. Patients with prior ICI or targeted therapy represent a high-risk subgroup with poorer outcomes, supporting exploration of intensified or novel strategies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Messing et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a80aecb39a600b3ee652https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyag043
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper