PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026BMJ Open0 citationsOpen Access

A cultural lens on decision-making in treatment decisions about inflammatory bowel disease: a qualitative analysis with South Asian patients, caregivers and clinicians in Canada

View Full Paper
NSNitya SuryaprakashSRShannon M. RuzyckiMRMaitreyi Raman

Key Points

  • This study explores how South Asian patients, caregivers, and clinicians perceive treatment decision-making for inflammatory bowel disease.
  • Descriptive qualitative study using in-depth semi-structured interviews.
  • Participants included South Asian patients, caregivers, and clinicians in Canada.
  • Data analyzed using deductive and inductive thematic analysis.
  • Decision-making influenced by factors like residency status and community involvement.
  • Patients reported high satisfaction with decision-making processes.
  • Clinicians expressed lower satisfaction compared to patients.

Abstract

Objective There are limited data about how South Asian (SA) patients, their caregivers and their physicians make decisions about treatment, in particular advanced therapies. The study aimed to explore how SA people with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), their family members and clinicians experience and perceive treatment-related decision-making with the aim of identifying strategies to improve treatment decision-making in Canada. Design A descriptive qualitative study with in-depth semi-structured interviews. Setting Canada. Participants Adults residing in Canada, who self-identified as SA, had received treatment or cared for someone who received treatment for IBD from a gastroenterologist in Canada, and who spoke and understood English, Hindi and/or Punjabi were eligible to participate in the study. Clinician participants (eg, nurses, gastroenterologists, colorectal surgeons) were eligible if they had experience treating SA patients with IBD. Interventions Data from 1:1, semi-structured interviews were analysed using deductive and inductive thematic analysis. Results The length of time spent in Canada played a central role in patient perspectives on decision-making around IBD treatment. First or second-generation SA people, residency status, family and community involvement, universal factors like stigma, medication costs and preferences for non-pharmacological treatments influenced decision-making. Patient and caregiver participants reported high satisfaction with treatment-related decision-making processes, while clinician participants self-reported lesser satisfaction. Conclusions Clinicians and researchers working with SA patients in chronic disease specialties can use these findings to meet the healthcare needs and reduce disparities in optimal treatment for this patient population. Trial registration N/A.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Suryaprakash et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a818ecb39a600b3ee8b5https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113208
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Patients’ motives and considerations on treatment decision-making for heavy menstrual bleeding: a qualitative study2024 · 5 citations
  2. 2Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests2021 · 6,074 citations
  3. 3Emerging inflammatory bowel disease demographics, phenotype, and treatment in South Asia, South‐East Asia, and Middle East: Preliminary findings from the Inflammatory Bowel Disease‐Emerging Nations' Consortium2022 · 36 citations
  4. 4Patient involvement in treatment decision-making: The case for a broader conceptual framework2006 · 320 citations
  5. 5Association of California Immigrants' Avoidance of Public Programs Due to Immigration Concerns With Delayed Access to Health Care2022 · 6 citations