PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026JGH Open0 citationsOpen Access

A Qualitative Template Analysis to Understand Patient and Practitioner Perspectives on a Psychological Intervention for Fatigue in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

View Full Paper
CECatherine EmersonAKAnna KlasPGPeter R. Gibson

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate patient and health professional opinions on a psychological intervention for managing fatigue in inflammatory bowel disease.
  • Conducted semi-structured interviews with seven patients and seven health professionals.
  • Utilized template analysis to derive themes and insights from the interviews.
  • Focused on patient experiences and health professional concerns regarding intervention feasibility.
  • Identified four key themes: trade-off, trust, accountability, and accessibility.
  • Patients prioritized a self-led online intervention with peer support.
  • Health professionals expressed concerns about cost-effectiveness and intervention duration.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aims Fatigue in IBD is pervasive, with very few intervention options available to patients. Research has indicated that psychological therapies are a promising strategy for managing IBD fatigue. However, no such intervention is available to date. This study aimed to evaluate the opinion of patients and health professionals on a potential psychological intervention for IBD fatigue. Methods and Results A total of seven patients (Crohn's disease = 5, ulcerative colitis = 2) and seven health professionals participated in semi‐structured interviews. Results were derived by using a template analysis, revealing four key themes and associated subthemes: (1) it's a trade‐off; (2) buy‐in, trust and credibility; (3) accountability; and (4) accessibility and equity. Important factors identified were a self‐led online intervention, where patients can converse with other patients. Patients determined a facilitator with IBD‐specific knowledge to be important. Health professionals were concerned with the cost‐effectiveness and duration of an intervention, whereas patients were less concerned about the financial cost if there is perceived benefit to the intervention. Conclusion Findings indicate the need to balance support with accessibility for patients. The lack of consensus of who can deliver an intervention by health professionals is significant and underscores the need for mental health care to be integrated into IBD health services. Nurses were recommended as an alternative to mental health professionals. However, the nurses interviewed emphasized the impact this would pose on their workloads. As such, there needs to be a diversity of supporting staff in IBD health care teams to ensure that future psychological interventions are feasible.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Emerson et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a82decb39a600b3ee8fehttps://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.70363
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper