PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026Clinical Cancer Research0 citations

Abstract PD11-03: Predicting treatment outcomes in breast cancer from H&E slides using pathology foundation models with multiple instance learning

View Full Paper
ASAnthony M. SunSVSara J. VentersCYC. Yau

Key Points

  • The aim is to predict pathologic complete response (pCR) in breast cancer using deep learning from H&E-stained slides.
  • Applied attention-based multiple instance learning to predict pCR from pre-treatment H&E-stained WSIs.
  • Analyzed 3,306 WSIs from 911 patients across 13 treatment arms using a pathology foundation model.
  • Compared model performance with AUROC against traditional elastic net regression models.
  • 298 of 911 patients achieved pCR with varying success across treatment arms (AUROC 0.501-0.893).
  • MIL outperformed traditional models in 5 out of 6 arms tested.
  • Model predictions were notably stronger in HR+ subgroups compared to HR- subgroups.

Abstract

Abstract Background. Pathologic complete response (pCR) is the absence of residual invasive cancer in the breast and axillary lymph nodes after neoadjuvant therapy. In breast cancer treatment, pCR is a proven surrogate for long-term outcomes. However, accurately predicting pCR at diagnosis remains a clinical challenge. Current tools primarily rely on clinical, genomic, or transcriptomic data. Advances in computational pathology and deep learning enable the extraction of meaningful features from H 0.5). Highest model performance was in HER2+ cohorts: (1) Paclitaxel + Trastuzumab and (2) Paclitaxel + Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab (AUROC = 0.893, 0.785) (Table 1). Of the 6 arms, MIL outperformed the elastic net trained on pathologist-assessed histology features in 5 arms. After including FTV and RPS in the elastic net, MIL still outperformed in 3 arms. Across subtypes, the model predicted better in HR+ subgroups (HR+/HER2- AUROC = 0.706, HR+/HER2+ AUROC = 0.677) than in HR- subgroups (HR-/HER2+ AUROC = 0.533, HR-/HER2- AUROC = 0.548). Conclusion. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of applying MIL vision models to predict treatment-specific response in breast cancer, even with frozen section WSIs and limited data. MIL detects important histology patterns not captured by conventional pathology. Even with added MRI and transcriptomic data, the model provides complementary predictive value. This approach enables early, accurate predictions from routine histology and supports personalized, less toxic treatment—particularly in under-resourced settings. Citation Format: A. Sun, S. Venters, C. Yau, D. Wolf, G. Hirst, M. Campbell, A. Asare, W. Symmans, L. Brown-Swigart, N. Hylton, J. Perlmutter, A. DeMichele, D. Yee, H. Rugo, A. Borowsky, F. Howard, L. Esserman, L. van't Veer, A. Basu. Predicting treatment outcomes in breast cancer from H 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD11-03.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a82decb39a600b3eea9bhttps://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-pd11-03
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper