PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026Human Reproduction0 citations

Single-step warming for blastocysts: a clinically validated alternative to conventional multi-step protocols

View Full Paper
SGStefanie De GheselleLVL De VuystSLSylvie Lierman

Key Points

  • To evaluate if a single-step warming protocol for vitrified blastocysts yields better outcomes than a conventional multi-step protocol in IVF.
  • Conducted a three-phase validation study at a university-based IVF center.
  • Analyzed preclinical outcomes using 246 blastocysts and retrospective clinical comparisons over a year between both protocols.
  • Assessed survival, intactness, and transfer suitability in blastocysts warmed using single-step and multi-step methods.
  • Single-step warming resulted in significantly higher blastocyst survival and intactness rates compared to multi-step warming.
  • Transfer rates were greater for single-step warmed blastocysts across various subgroups.
  • Although some early pregnancy outcomes favored multi-step, ongoing pregnancy rates were similar across protocols, with a trend of lower miscarriage rates for single-step.

Abstract

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Can a single-step warming protocol for vitrified blastocysts provide comparable or superior outcomes to a conventional multi-step warming approach in a clinical IVF setting? SUMMARY ANSWER Single-step warming resulted in higher blastocyst survival, intactness, and transfer rates compared to the conventional multi-step protocol, with comparable ongoing pregnancy rates and a consistent trend toward lower miscarriage rates across all subgroups. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY While vitrification has become the gold standard for embryo cryopreservation, the warming process remains critical to embryo survival and implantation potential. Traditional warming relies on multi-step dilution protocols to minimize osmotic stress. Preliminary studies have suggested that single-step rehydration protocols may be equally effective, but data on clinical validation remain scarce. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A three-phase validation study was conducted at a single university-based IVF centre including (i) risk analysis, (ii) preclinical validation (n = 246 blastocysts), and (iii) a clinical comparison of outcomes over one year (March 2024–March 2025) between single-step warming (n = 1925 cycles) and the conventional multi-step protocol (n = 1744 cycles, March 2023–March 2024). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS In the preclinical phase, vitrified surplus and PGT blastocysts were rewarmed using the single-step protocol and compared to historical controls. Survival (≥50% intact cells), intactness (100% intact), and transfer suitability were assessed. Single-step warmed blastocysts were monitored for 24 h post-warming in a time-lapse incubator, and viability was further evaluated using live/dead fluorescent staining to quantify cell damage. In the clinical phase, outcomes (survival, transfer rate, pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, miscarriage) were retrospectively compared across protocols, stratified by PGT status and day of vitrification. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE In the preclinical phase, blastocyst survival was ≥50% in 99.1% of cases after single-step warming versus 96.8% after multi-step warming (P = 0.0924). Fully intact blastocysts were significantly more frequent in the single-step group (85.4% vs. 76.3%, P = 0.0058), and transfer suitability at 2 h post-warming was also higher (96.7% vs. 91.2%, P = 0.0076). Time-lapse monitoring confirmed a high re-expansion rate (93.9%) with a mean re-expansion time of 3.3 ± 2.7 h. Fluorescent viability staining showed that 90.5% of blastocysts exhibited no or minimal cell damage. In the clinical cohort, significantly higher survival rates were seen in the single-step group across multiple subgroups, including non-PGT Day 5 (98.5% vs. 96.1%, P = 0.0003) and PGT Day 5 (100% vs. 98.2%, P = 0.0407) blastocysts. Fully intact rates were significantly higher in all subgroups and transfer rates were significantly higher in the single-step group for non-PGT Day 6 (97.2% vs. 92.8%, P = 0.0060) and PGT Day 5 cycles (100% vs. 97.8%, P = 0.0209). While some early pregnancy outcomes (e.g. clinical pregnancy in non-PGT Day 5) favoured the multi-step protocol (40.5% vs. 35.7%, P = 0.0286), ongoing pregnancy rates were not significantly different in any subgroup. Miscarriage rates showed a consistent trend in favour of single-step warming but did not reach statistical significance. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION This was a single-centre study, and the control group was retrospective. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The single-step warming protocol is a clinically validated, safe, and efficient alternative to conventional multi-step warming. Its implementation may improve workflow and streamline blastocyst handling without compromising clinical outcomes. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No external funding was received. The authors declare no conflicts of interest apart from KT, who has received travel support related to the manuscript from Fuijifilm Irvine Scientific, in the form of payment to her institution. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gheselle et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a83eecb39a600b3eeafbhttps://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deag021
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper