PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Association between stress hyperglycemia ratio and ICU delirium among critically ill adults in MIMIC-IV

CWChong WangLLLili LvRMRongrong Ma

Key Points

  • This study aims to investigate the association between the stress hyperglycemia ratio and the risk of delirium in ICU patients.
  • Analyzed a retrospective cohort of 2946 ICU patients from the MIMIC-IV database.
  • Classified stress hyperglycemia ratio into quartiles for analysis.
  • Employed logistic regression models to assess the relationship between SHR and delirium risk.
  • Conducted subgroup analyses and restricted cubic spline analysis to evaluate dose–response relationships.
  • 21% of patients developed delirium within the first 24 hours of ICU admission.
  • Higher SHR was associated with an increased risk of delirium, particularly in quartiles Q3 and Q4.
  • The odds ratio for Q3 was 1.58 and for Q4 was 1.59, indicating significant trends in increased risk.
  • A nonlinear relationship was observed with an inflection point at an SHR of 1.192.

Abstract

Abstract Delirium is a common neuropsychiatric complication in intensive care unit (ICU) patients and is associated with poor outcomes. This retrospective cohort study analyzed 2946 ICU patients from the MIMIC-IV database to examine whether the stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) is associated with delirium. SHR was classified into quartiles: Q1 (≤ 0.85), Q2 (0.86–1.01), Q3 (1.02–1.24), and Q4 (≥ 1.25). Delirium was assessed by confusion assessment method for the ICU (CAM-ICU). Logistic regression analyses with sequential adjustment for covariates were conducted across four models. Dose–response relationships were examined using restricted cubic splines (RCS), and subgroup analyses were performed to test interactions. After the first 24 h of being in the ICU, 21% (n = 619) of patients developed delirium for the first time. Higher SHR was associated with greater delirium risk in the unadjusted and partially adjusted models. After full adjustment, the continuous estimate narrowly missed statistical significance (Model 4: OR = 1.24, 95% CI 0.99–1.56; p = 0.057). When SHR was divided into quartiles, compared to Q1, patients in Q3 (OR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.14–2.2) and Q4 (OR = 1.59, 95% CI 1.15–2.21) had higher risk, with a significant trend ( p for trend < 0.001). RCS analysis indicated a nonlinear relationship, and threshold-effect analysis identified an inflection point at SHR = 1.192. Subgroup analyses detected no significant interactions, with the positive association between SHR and delirium risk consistent across all subgroups. Four sensitivity analyses further supported the robustness of the SHR–delirium association. Overall, SHR showed a positive, nonlinear relationship with delirium in ICU patients, with an inflection point at 1.192, and may serve as a pragmatic predictor to inform delirium prevention in critical illness.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a85cecb39a600b3eef20https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40380-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper