PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026Clinical Cancer Research0 citations

Abstract PS3-10-09: Improving Timeliness of Adjuvant Therapy Through Reduction of Oncotype DX Turnaround Time: A Multi-Site Quality Improvement Initiative at a Rural-Academic Cancer Network in West Virginia

View Full Paper
MHMichelle HartzellSNSanjana NethaganiNHNolan Holley

Key Points

  • The study aimed to decrease the turnaround time for Oncotype DX testing to improve timely initiation of adjuvant therapy in breast cancer patients.
  • Implemented a quality improvement project using the Plan–Do–Study–Act model across 15 WVUCI sites
  • Integrated Oncotype DX ordering and reporting into electronic medical records (EMR)
  • Bypassed insurance pre-authorization for specimen processing
  • Collected patient demographics and treatment history for Oncotype DX testing
  • Analyzed data using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Chi-square test
  • Median turnaround time decreased from 12 days at baseline to 8 days after full interventions
  • Time from surgery to initiation of first adjuvant treatment decreased from 63 days to 54 days
  • Proportion of patients initiating treatment within 8 weeks increased to 55% after interventions
  • Statistical significance was observed for turnaround time and treatment initiation times between intervention groups

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Timely initiation of adjuvant therapy is critical for patients with early-stage, HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer and is optimally achieved within 4 to 8 weeks post-surgery. At the West Virginia University Cancer Institute (WVUCI), a single health system serving both rural and urban patients at 16 cancer centers, delays in Oncotype DX Recurrence Score testing and prolonged time intervals between testing results and adjuvant therapy initiation can lead to suboptimal care delivery. This quality improvement (QI) initiative targeted Oncotype DX turnaround time (TAT) as a modifiable factor to facilitate timely, risk-adapted adjuvant therapy, and increase the rate of treatment initiation within guideline-recommended timeframes. Methods: Using a Plan–Do–Study–Act (PDSA) model, a multi-phase QI project was implemented at 15 WVUCI sites. Interventions included: (1) EMR integration of Oncotype DX ordering and reporting via Epic Aura (August 2025) and (2) insurance pre-authorization bypass for specimen processing and release of results (January 2025). An IRB-approved protocol was used to collect patient demographics and treatment history for all patients that underwent Oncotype DX testing between January 2024 and May 2025. Patients were divided into three groups by intervention phase: (1) pre-intervention, (2) post-EMR integration, and (3) post-full interventions. Primary outcomes included Oncotype TAT, time from surgery to adjuvant chemotherapy, and time from surgery to first adjuvant therapy with chemotherapy or radiation. Statistical analyses included the Kruskal-Wallis test due to non-normal data distribution, the post-hoc Dunn’s test, and Chi square test. Results: A total of 339 Oncotype DX orders were analyzed across the system during the QI initiative. The patient population was 97% female and 57% were aged ≥65 years. There were 89% of patients with stage I disease and 11% with stage II. A total of 75% of patients received adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiation, with 15% treated with chemotherapy and 69% treated with radiation. Following implementation of the interventions, median TAT decreased from a median of 12 days (IQR 8-20) at baseline to 9 (IQR 8-13) and 8 days in groups 2 and 3, respectively. A significant difference in TAT between groups was observed (p0.001, Kruskal-Wallis test) with significant differences in all pairwise comparisons in a post-hoc analysis (p0.001, Dunn’s test). Time from surgery to initiation of first adjuvant treatment decreased from a baseline median of 63 days (IQR 46-77) to 62 (IQR 48-86) and 54 days (IQR 41-75) in groups 2 and 3, respectively. There were significant differences in time from surgery to initiation of adjuvant treatment between groups (p0.05, Kruskal-Wallis test). The proportion of patients who initiated adjuvant treatment within 8 weeks of surgery increased from 40.0% at baseline to 42.4% and 55.0% in groups 2 and 3, respectively (p=0.12, Chi-square test). This increase reflected an approximately 38% relative improvement from baseline. Conclusions: This QI initiative led to significant and sustained reductions in Oncotype DX turnaround time and improved timeliness of adjuvant therapy initiation. Although the increased proportion of patients who initiated adjuvant treatment within 8 weeks of surgery did not reach statistical significance, the trend suggests improved timeliness of care delivery. System-level process redesign with Oncotype DX EMR integration and insurance streamlining proved feasible and impactful across a rural-academic network. Ongoing efforts will focus on reducing the interval between result availability and therapy initiation, with a goal to increase the rate of adjuvant therapy initiation within 8 weeks from 55% to 80%. Citation Format: M. Hartzell, S. Nethagani, N. Holley, O. Chintuya, S. Wen, K. Barnett, D. Safi, S. Kurian, M. Hafez, B. Jiang. Improving Timeliness of Adjuvant Therapy Through Reduction of Oncotype DX Turnaround Time: A Multi-Site Quality Improvement Initiative at a Rural-Academic Cancer Network in West Virginia abstract. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS3-10-09.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hartzell et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a879ecb39a600b3ef39bhttps://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps3-10-09
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Abstract PS5-11-23: Timing of Oncotype DX Testing and Its Impact on Treatment Initiation in ER+/HER2-/N0 Breast Cancer Patients2026
  2. 2Improving the OncotypeDX ordering process in patients with ER+ HER2- early-stage breast cancer: A longitudinal QI project.2024
  3. 3Optimizing workflow for OncotypeDx result turnaround time from surgery to report at safety net hospital.2024 · 1 citations
  4. 4Abstract PO3-01-13: A study of the impact of the implementation of the Oncotype Dx 21-gene breast-cancer assay during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic for 1-3 node positive early breast cancer: The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre Experience2024
  5. 5Targeted interventions to address local challenges in HR+/HER2- and HER2+ breast cancer treatment in community-based settings.2024