PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026Sustainability0 citationsOpen Access

Joint Optimization of Spare Part Manufacturing and Maintenance Workforce Scheduling Under Heterogeneous In-Warranty and Out-of-Warranty Demands

View Full Paper
YMYinwen MaQDQianwang DengJZJuan Zhou

Key Points

  • The aim is to optimize the scheduling of spare parts production and maintenance workforce under varying demands.
  • Integrated scheduling of spare parts production and maintenance personnel
  • Utilization of improved non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II
  • Implementation of Q-learning for adaptive local search strategy selection
  • Comparison of performance metrics with four mainstream algorithms
  • Q-learning mechanism reduced the IGD metric by 55%
  • HV metric increased by 65% compared to random local search operators
  • QLNSGA outperformed RIPG by 58% in IGD index
  • General superiority in HV index over other comparative algorithms

Abstract

The efficient operation of the maintenance service system is key to achieving sustainable operations, with its core lying in the coordinated scheduling of spare parts production and maintenance personnel, as well as the holistic management of in-warranty and out-of-warranty demands. This approach optimizes resource allocation and enhances long-term service value. This paper investigates the integrated scheduling of distributed spare parts production and maintenance personnel with differentiated in-warranty and out-of-warranty demands (ISSPD). To solve the ISSPD, an improved non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II that uses Q-learning to adaptively select local search strategies (QLNSGA) is proposed, which incorporates a decoding strategy for differentiated order types, eight knowledge-driven local search strategies, and a Q-learning mechanism for the adaptive selection of key local search operators. Compared to random local search operators, the Q-learning mechanism achieves a 55% decrease in IGD metric and a 65% increase in HV metric. Through comparative experiments with four mainstream algorithms, QLNSGA outperforms RIPG by 58% in terms of the IGD index, and its HV index is generally superior to that of comparative algorithms such as MOEA/D. This indicates that QLNSGA exhibits superior performance in both computational efficiency and solution quality, effectively enhancing service levels and significantly reducing operational costs, thereby providing scientific decision support for service-oriented manufacturing enterprises.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a887ecb39a600b3ef5behttps://doi.org/10.3390/su18042047
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper