PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026European Journal of Preventive Cardiology4 citations

Normalized creatinine-to-cystatin C ratio and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk in the UK Biobank

View Full Paper
XLXiaoyan LiuHZHuizhi ZhanYOYi Ou

Key Points

  • To assess the association between the normalized creatinine-to-cystatin C ratio (NCCR) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk.
  • Included 267,167 participants from the UK Biobank enrolled between 2006 and 2010.
  • Calculated baseline NCCR using a formula based on creatinine and cystatin C levels and body weight.
  • Utilized multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate the relationship between NCCR and ASCVD risk.
  • Conducted Kaplan–Meier curves and sensitivity analyses for result robustness.
  • Of 267,167 participants, 27,026 developed ASCVD over 15 years.
  • A significant negative association was found between NCCR and ASCVD (HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.89 - 0.92).
  • Non-linear associations were significant for males; linear associations were stronger for females.
  • Stratified and interaction analyses confirmed the stability of results.

Abstract

Abstract Objective The normalized creatinine-to-cystatin C ratio (NCCR) is a novel composite biomarker that approximates relative skeletal muscle mass and diabetes risk. However, the association between NCCR and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) remains unclear. In this study, we obtained data from the UK Biobank with the aim to assess the association between the NCCR and ASCVD risk. Methods This study included 267167 participants from the UK Biobank enrolled between 2006 and 2010. Baseline NCCR was determined using the following formula: creatinine mg/dL/cystatin C mg/L × 10/body weight kg. The primary study outcome was the all-cause ASCVD incidence. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the relationship between NCCR and ASCVD. Kaplan–Meier curves, restricted cubic spline (RCS), subgroup, and sensitivity analyses was conducted to enhance the robustness of our results. Results During a 15 years follow-up in average, 27026 participants developed ASCVD. NCCR showed a significant negative association with ASCVD (hazard ratio HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.89 - 0.92). Further sex-specific analysis revealed significant negative non-linear associations between NCCR and ASCVD in males, whereas a stronger linear association in females. Moreover, stratified and interaction analyses of the subgroups and several sensitivity analyses confirmed the stability of our core results. Conclusions A high NCCR was independently associated with a reduced risk of ASCVD, particularly in females. Therefore, NCCR, which can be easily calculated from standard blood biochemistry, may potentially improve ASCVD risk assessment without the requirement of additional laboratory testing.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a887ecb39a600b3ef693https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwag113
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper