PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026Clinical Cancer Research0 citations

Abstract PS1-12-30: Real-world outcomes of first-line cdk4/6 inhibitor use in hr+/her2− metastatic breast cancer: a single-institution experience

View Full Paper
FFF. T. FAQIHIMAM. F. ALDAWOUDNAN.S. Algazlan

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of first-line CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer by analyzing progression-free survival and predictors of early progression.
  • Conducted a retrospective analysis of 82 patients treated at a tertiary cancer center.
  • Compared outcomes between patients receiving first-line CDK4/6 inhibitors and those on non-CDK therapies.
  • Estimated progression-free survival using Kaplan-Meier methods.
  • Performed subgroup analyses and logistic regression for predictors of short progression-free survival.
  • Median progression-free survival was 22.2 months, with greater PFS in de novo cases compared to recurrent cases.
  • Visceral metastases were linked to shorter PFS, with 61% of CDK4/6-treated patients affected.
  • No significant difference in PFS was found between the two CDK4/6 inhibitors, palbociclib and abemaciclib.
  • The overall survival data was immature due to low event rates, with only 13.4% of patients experiencing death events.

Abstract

Abstract Background: CDK4/6 inhibitors are a standard first-line treatment for HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, real-world data are needed to confirm their effectiveness outside clinical trial settings. This study evaluates progression-free survival (PFS) and identifies predictors of early progression in patients who received first-line CDK4/6 inhibitors at a tertiary cancer center. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 82 patients with HR+/HER2− MBC treated at King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, between January 2021 and December 2023. Patients were categorized based on receipt of first-line CDK4/6 inhibitors (n=59) vs non-CDK therapies (n=22). PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Subgroup analyses and logistic regression were performed to identify predictors of short PFS (12 months) among CDK4/6-treated patients. Results: Among the 82 patients, median age was 50 years (range: 30-78), 93% were female, 70% had de novo MBC, and 44% had visceral metastases. Visceral crisis was observed in 7.3% of the cohort.Of the 59 patients treated with first-line CDK4/6 inhibitors (33 palbociclib, 26 abemaciclib). Visceral metastases were present in 61%, while 32% had bone-only disease. AI was the endocrine partner in 71%, and fulvestrant in 29%. Median PFS was 22.2 months (range: 1.0-55.4), with longer PFS in de novo vs recurrent (24.3 vs 16.4 mo) and bone-only vs visceral metastases (27.9 vs 18.5 mo). No significant PFS difference was observed between palbociclib and abemaciclib.Multivariable analysis identified recurrent presentation and visceral metastases as predictors of shorter PFS. To date, death events occurred in only 11 of 82 patients (13.4%), precluding meaningful OS analysis. Conclusion: First-line CDK4/6 inhibitors offer substantial PFS benefit in HR+/HER2− MBC. No difference in outcome was observed between palbociclib and abemaciclib. OS data remain immature due to limited follow-up and low event rate. Recurrent presentation and visceral disease were associated with shorter PFS and may warrant closer monitoring in clinical practice. Citation Format: F. T. FAQIHI, M. F. ALDAWOUD, N. ALGAZLAN, A. A. ALMAZYAD, A. R. ALTAMIMI, M. RUDAINEE, M. M. ALHARBI, A. A. ALWOHAIBI, A. K. ALTWAIRGI. Real-world outcomes of first-line cdk4/6 inhibitor use in hr+/her2− metastatic breast cancer: a single-institution experience abstract. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-12-30.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

FAQIHI et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a898ecb39a600b3ef6b2https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps1-12-30
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper