PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026Cerebral Cortex0 citationsOpen Access

Corticospinal axon responses to different current directions induced by TMS in anesthetized macaques

View Full Paper
IGIsabel S. GloverSES. A. EdgleySBStephen Baker

Key Points

  • The research aims to understand how different current directions in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) affect corticospinal axon responses.
  • Recorded responses of 249 corticospinal axons at C5 in six anesthetized macaques.
  • Applied focal TMS over the primary motor cortex (M1) with varying current directions (posterior–anterior and anterior–posterior).
  • Analyzed the resulting direct and indirect corticospinal volleys based on different latencies.
  • Both posterior–anterior and anterior–posterior currents generated direct (D) and indirect (I) waves.
  • Posterior–anterior stimulation selectively produced D-waves, while anterior–posterior stimulation induced late I-waves.
  • The proportion of axons responding in multiple latency windows increased with stimulation intensity, particularly for anterior–posterior currents.
  • Axon conduction velocity did not impact response probability, except for those responding to anterior–posterior TMS at late I latency, which showed faster conduction speeds.

Abstract

Abstract When applied over the primary motor cortex (M1), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) generates repetitive corticospinal volleys; the earliest is caused by direct (D) corticospinal stimulation; later indirect (I) waves likely arise from transsynaptic activation. A figure-of-eight coil can focus stimulation to a small cortical region. Changing the induced current direction may allow preferential stimulation of different waves, but there is little empirical evidence on the underlying single cell mechanisms. We examined the responses to focal TMS over M1 of 249 corticospinal axons recorded at C5 in six anesthetized monkeys. D, early indirect (I1) and late I-waves could all be generated by TMS with both posterior–anterior (PA) and anterior–posterior (AP) induced currents. However, at moderate intensities, PA stimulation selectively generated D-waves, and AP generated late I-waves. Most axons only responded within one latency window (D, I1 or late I) to either orientation; the number responding in multiple windows grew with increasing intensity, especially for AP stimulation. Axon conduction velocity had no effect on response probability, except for axons responding to AP TMS at late I latency which had significantly faster conduction velocity than those without late I responses. These results provide fine-grain details of how focal TMS activates the corticospinal tract.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Glover et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a8c7ecb39a600b3efcc6https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhag015
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Localized stimulation of neural tissues in the brain by means of a paired configuration of time-varying magnetic fields1988 · 446 citations
  2. 2Excitation of pyramidal tract cells by intracortical microstimulation: effective extent of stimulating current.1968 · 687 citations
  3. 3SINGLE- AND MULTIPLE-UNIT ANALYSIS OF CORTICAL STAGE OF PYRAMIDAL TRACT ACTIVATION1954 · 708 citations
  4. 4Descending Pathways in Motor Control2008 · 1,638 citations
  5. 5Non‐invasive assessment of superficial and deep layer circuits in human motor cortex2019 · 21 citations