PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026Water1 citationsOpen Access

Enhancing Detection of Pharmaceuticals in Environmental Waters via 3D-Printed Extraction and ESI-HPLC-MS/MS

View Full Paper
VRVerónica Rodríguez-SaldañaCentro de Investigación en Materiales AvanzadosCCCésar Castro-GarcíaCentro de Investigación en Materiales AvanzadosJLJennifer M. Luna-DíazCentro de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados

Key Points

  • This research aims to enhance the detection of common analgesics in environmental waters using a novel extraction method.
  • Developed an ESI-HPLC-MS/MS-based method for analyzing ibuprofen, paracetamol, and diclofenac.
  • Utilized 3D printing for the extraction process to enhance efficiency.
  • Applied specific elution techniques for each pharmaceutical detected, including gradient and isocratic methods.
  • Conducted validation of the extraction method using commercial tablets and surface water samples.
  • Achieved low limits of detection (LOD) for ibuprofen, paracetamol, and diclofenac: 40.91 ng/L, 3.64 ng/L, and 1.96 ng/L respectively.
  • Demonstrated high precision with relative standard deviation (RSD) values between 0.6-4.16%.
  • Reduced mobile phase consumption to only 4 mL per analysis with a runtime of less than 7 minutes.
  • Validated usage of the 3D-printed device for up to 10 extraction cycles.

Abstract

Ibuprofen (IBU), paracetamol (PARA), and diclofenac (DIC) are three of the most used non-opioid analgesics and are most frequently detected in the environment. Some methods to analyze these compounds in water have been previously reported, but they have limitations such as long analysis time, high reagent consumption, and lack of sensitivity. An electrospray ionization high-performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (ESI-HPLC-MS/MS)-based method was developed for the determination of these analgesics, applying 3D printing to improve the extraction process. The method was validated and applied to quantify the target pharmaceuticals using commercial tablets. For PARA and DIC, a gradient elution with 0.1% formic acid in water (A) and 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile (B) was employed. For the analysis of IBU, an isocratic elution with 10 mM acetate in water (A) and acetonitrile (B) was used. ESI-MS/MS spectra were obtained in positive polarity to identify DIC and PARA, while negative polarity was used for IBU. LOD were 40.91, 3.64, and 1.96, and the LOQ were 136.36, 12.15, and 6.52 ng/L for IBU, PARA, and DIC, respectively. R2 was >0.99 and RSD < 10% in all cases. The 3D-printed extraction device can be used for up to 10 cycles. This method demonstrated a remarkable performance compared to previous studies, mainly in terms of precision (RSD = 0.6–4.16%), mobile phase consumption (4 mL), and analysis time (<7 min), and was applied in the analysis of surface water samples.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rodríguez-Saldaña et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a8c7ecb39a600b3efd29https://doi.org/10.3390/w18040501
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper