PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics0 citationsOpen Access

In‐Silico Trial of Same‐Day Simulation‐Free Spatially Fractionated Adaptive Radiotherapy (SF 2 ‐ART)

View Full Paper
DSDennis N. StanleyUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamABAlyssa R. BirchmeierUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamSBSanne E. BlindeAustin Hospital

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess the feasibility and deliverability of a same-day, simulation-free workflow for spatially fractionated adaptive radiotherapy.
  • Conducted an in-silico trial with ten patients previously treated with spatially fractionated radiotherapy.
  • Implemented a two-phase regimen delivering SBRT doses to predefined high-dose areas and gross tumor volumes.
  • Performed planning workflow entirely in silico without CT simulation and analyzed adaptive plans based on CBCT anatomy.
  • Utilized Mobius3D for secondary dose verification and compared outcomes against originally delivered clinical plans.
  • All cases successfully replanned using the SF 2 -ART workflow without simulation imaging.
  • Dosimetric comparisons showed minimal differences between adaptive and clinically delivered plans.
  • Median total estimated workflow time was 166.4 minutes.
  • Target coverage and normal tissue constraints were maintained across all cases.

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Here we present an in‐silico trial of the feasibility and deliverability of a same‐day, simulation‐free workflow for spatially fractionated adaptive radiotherapy (SF 2 ‐ART) using the Varian Ethos platform. Methods and Materials Ten patients (five thoracic and five extremity), previously treated with spatially fractionated radiotherapy (SFRT), were selected for this in silico trial. A two‐phase regimen was simulated: Phase 1 delivered 12 Gy SBRT to a uniform, predefined high‐dose lattice and 4 Gy to the gross tumor volume (GTV); Phase 2 consisted of 4 additional fractions of 4 Gy to the GTV. The planning workflow was performed entirely in silico, without the need for CT simulation. High‐dose sphere matrices were generated with a custom script and aligned to physician‐defined GTVs. Adaptive plans were created based on CBCT anatomy and evaluated for dosimetric quality, deliverability, and workflow timing. Comparisons were made to the original clinically delivered plans. Mobius3D was used for secondary dose verification. Results All 10 cases were successfully replanned using the SF 2 ‐ART workflow without simulation‐based imaging. The entire planning and treatment process, including consultation, contouring, adaptive plan generation, and QA, was performed within a single session. Dosimetric comparisons showed minimal differences between simulation‐free adaptive and clinically delivered plans, with target coverage and normal tissue constraints maintained across all cases. Median total estimated workflow time was 166.4 min. Conclusions This in‐silico study demonstrates the feasibility of delivering spatially fractionated SBRT without simulation CT using a same‐day adaptive workflow. The SF 2 ‐ART approach may enable rapid, high‐quality treatment for patients with urgent or symptomatic presentations and supports future prospective clinical implementation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stanley et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a8c7ecb39a600b3efd93https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70517
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper