PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 20, 2026Atmospheric chemistry and physics0 citationsOpen Access

Constraining a data-driven CO 2 flux model by ecosystem and atmospheric observations using atmospheric transport

SUSamuel UptonMRMarkus ReichsteinWPWouter Peters

Key Points

  • The aim is to improve estimates of net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of CO2 by integrating various data sources.
  • Develop a hybrid model combining ecosystem-level eddy-covariance data with atmospheric CO2 data.
  • Use atmospheric transport dynamics for accurate scaling of NEE.
  • Utilize one year of daytime observations from 3 tall-tower observatories for training.
  • The new model estimates an annual CO2 sink with minimal bias.
  • Achieves consistent interannual variability (IAV) comparable to atmospheric inversions.
  • Shows a higher correlation with atmospheric data compared to traditional bottom-up models.

Abstract

Abstract. Global estimates of the net ecosystem exchange of CO2 (NEE) from data-driven models differ widely depending on their underlying data and methodology. Bottom-up models trained on eddy-covariance data are most informative at the ecosystem-level. Top-down models, such as atmospheric inversions, produce regional and global results consistent with the observed atmospheric growth rate, accurately capturing the interannual variability (IAV) of NEE. Both approaches have limitations estimating NEE across scales: Bottom-up models can miss large-scale dynamics of NEE when aggregated globally. Top-down approaches have difficulty relating the large-scale atmospheric signal to biophysical processes at smaller scales. To address these limitations, we create a model that uses a hybrid combination of direct observations and atmospheric dynamics to integrate ecosystem-level eddy-covariance data and atmospheric CO2 mole fraction data into a single coherent ecosystem-level flux model. Aggregated globally, our new model estimates an annual sink with a low bias, and consistent IAV when compared with independent estimates. The IAV of the estimated NEE is closer in magnitude to an ensemble of atmospheric inversions, and our model produces a higher temporal coefficient of correlation with these data than state-of-the-art bottom-up data-driven models. This improvement in IAV is achieved without direct access to the observed variability of the atmosphere: the model is trained using only one year of daytime observations from 3 tall-tower observatories. No atmospheric information is available to the model during the production of global NEE estimates. This shows the efficiency of our method in synthesizing top-down information into bottom-up mapping of flux-environment relationships.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Upton et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6997fa6dad1d9b11b345397ahttps://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-2561-2026
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Multi-decadal atmospheric carbon dioxide measurements in Hungary, central Europe2024 · 4 citations
  2. 2NDWI—A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space1996 · 6,967 citations
  3. 3Synergisms among Fire, Land Use, and Climate Change in the Amazon2008 · 251 citations
  4. 4The propagation of errors in long‐term measurements of land‐atmosphere fluxes of carbon and water1996 · 489 citations
  5. 5ObsPack: a framework for the preparation, delivery, and attribution of atmospheric greenhouse gas measurements2014 · 144 citations