PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Postoperative pain after endodontic treatment with glycolic acid as final irrigant using reciprocating and rotary instrumentation in a noninferiority trial

View Full Paper
PFPaola Serraglio FigueiredoYBYuri Dal BelloJCJoão Paulo De Carli

Key Points

  • To assess the non-inferiority of glycolic acid compared to ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid for postoperative pain after endodontic treatment.
  • Randomized clinical trial involving 240 patients
  • Patients assigned to groups based on irrigant (glycolic acid or EDTA) and instrumentation technique (reciprocating)
  • Postoperative pain measured using numeric rating scale at designated time points
  • Glycolic acid was found non-inferior to ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in reducing postoperative pain
  • Pain peaked at 24 hours and decreased significantly thereafter
  • 79.2% of patients reported absent or mild pain with no significant difference in analgesic intake among groups

Abstract

This randomized clinical trial was designed to evaluate whether glycolic acid (GA) is non-inferior to ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) regarding postoperative pain after endodontic treatment. A total of 240 patients requiring treatment were randomly assigned to four groups according to the irrigant (GA or EDTA) and the instrumentation technique (reciprocating or rotary). Postoperative pain was assessed using the numeric rating scale (NRS, 0–10) at 24 h, 48 h, and 7 days. A non-inferiority margin (Δ = 0.9) was prespecified as the maximum acceptable difference between GA and EDTA. Non-inferiority was concluded if the upper bound of the one-sided 95% confidence interval (equivalent to the two-sided 90% CI) for the difference in means (GA – EDTA) was below Δ. Analgesic intake was also recorded. Postoperative pain peaked at 24 h and significantly decreased over time ( p 0.05). Most patients reported absent or mild pain, and 79.2% did not require analgesics, with no significant difference among groups ( p = 0.616). GA is non-inferior to EDTA in terms of postoperative pain following endodontic treatment, regardless of instrumentation technique. Both irrigants provided similar clinical outcomes, with low analgesic intake and favorable patient-centered results. Trial registration number. Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (ReBec). Registration number RBR-44q9k6q. (Retrospectively registered: October 17, 2023).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Figueiredo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69990de85b97ab4c14ac281ahttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-33397-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials2010 · 13,616 citations
  2. 2Prevalence of and factors affecting postpreparation pain in patients undergoing two‐visit root canal treatment2004 · 157 citations
  3. 3The smear layer in endodontics – a review2009 · 664 citations
  4. 4The prevalence of postoperative pain and flare‐up in single‐ and multiple‐visit endodontic treatment: a systematic review2007 · 448 citations
  5. 5Theory versus Experiment in Jet Spectroscopy: Glycolic Acid1997 · 76 citations