PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 2026Biophysical Journal0 citations

BPS2026 – Loading-direction-dependent responses of alpha beta T cell receptors

View Full Paper
WHWonmuk HwangAAAoi AkitsuKBKristine N. Brazin

Key Points

  • This research aims to investigate the influence of mechanical load on alpha beta T cell receptor responses and differentiation.
  • Performed all-atom molecular dynamics simulations on TCRab-pMHC complexes
  • Applied picoNewton-level forces to analyze TCR-ligand interactions
  • Examined conformational changes and bond stability under varying load conditions.
  • Found distinct load-dependent responses in TCR signaling pathways
  • Demonstrated that load direction alters interfacial stability of TCR complexes
  • Showed that minor amino acid differences influence T cell differentiation into memory lineages.

Abstract

Alpha beta T cells recognize target ligands, antigenic peptide-loaded major histocompatibility complex molecules (pMHCs), displayed on antigen-presenting cells (APCs) with exquisite specificity and sensitivity via their alpha beta T cell receptors (TCRs). Underlying high performance TCR function is mechanosensing, a process whereby picoNewton-level forces applied to the TCRab-pMHC complexes during immune surveillance elicit a catch bond response. Depending on the type of TCR and the ligand, a reversible conformational transition may occur that extends the TCRab-pMHC bond lifetime by orders of magnitude, impacting functionality and cellular performance. Furthermore, it appears that different “modes of interaction” foster differentiation into distinct CD8 memory T cell subpopulations even though the corresponding TCRs recognize the same pMHC. To elucidate the basis of this divergence, we perform all-atom molecular dynamics simulations where picoNewton-level forces are applied to three structures of TCRab-pMHC (NP366/Db) complexes bearing an identical peptide from influenza A virus. While those TCRs differ by only 1-3 amino acid residues in their CDR3 loops, the corresponding T cells selectively differentiate into different CD8 memory cell lineages. Strikingly, despite their structural similarity, we find that the stability of the TCRab-pMHC interface without load differs among these systems and that the increase in interfacial stability depends on the direction of load. These results indicate that the differences in response to load may determine the load propagation pathway through the holo-TCR, which in turn leads to distinct signaling outcomes as the altered ectodomain motions divergently affect CD3 cytoplasmic signaling modules and downstream pathways.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hwang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69990df65b97ab4c14ac2cc4https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2025.11.1104
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper