PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 2026Biophysical Journal0 citations

BPS2026 – Protonation-dependent uptake and emergent chloride gating underpin fluoride selectivity in CLCF F−/H+antiporter

View Full Paper
ANAkihiro Y.Y. NakamuraTMTakuya Mabuchi

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand how protonation affects fluoride selectivity in CLCF antiporters.
  • Utilized atomistic molecular dynamics simulations
  • Employed free-energy profiling techniques
  • Identified key protonation states influencing fluoride uptake
  • Found that chloride presence induces a conformational transition affecting ion selectivity

Abstract

CLC-type fluoride/proton antiporters (CLCFs) safeguard cells from fluoride toxicity, yet the physical determinants of fluoride uptake and anion selectivity remain debated. Here, we combine atomistic molecular dynamics with free-energy profiling to dissect how the protonation of two conserved glutamates—Gluex (E118) and Gluin (E318)—controls early fluoride uptake events. We find that the state with a deprotonated E118 and protonated E318 enlarges the intracellular pore and lowers the potential-of-mean-force barrier for fluoride migration from the cytosol to the central site (Scen), promoting efficient uptake. Strikingly, in the presence of chloride at Scen the protein undergoes a helix-to-coil transition within residues 74–87. This local disorder stabilizes dehydrated chloride through favorable interactions while simultaneously impeding its forward translocation. The emergent conformational trap for chloride, together with the fluoride-favorable electrostatics and hydration thermodynamics in the deprotonated E118 and protonated E318 state, rationalizes the fluoride-over-chloride selectivity at the uptake stage. Our results reinforce and refine the original “windmill” mechanism by pinpointing a protonation-coupled uptake state that is selectively permissive to fluoride, and by revealing a chloride-induced conformational trap that disfavors chloride transport. These insights unify mechanistic proposals by showing how protonation, pore size, hydration penalties, and secondary-structure plasticity cooperate to bias flux toward fluoride. More broadly, our work illustrates a general biophysical principle for anion selectivity—coupling ion hydration energetics to localized backbone transitions can gate competing ions without imposing large global rearrangements. We anticipate that this framework will guide future experiments—mutagenesis of E118/E318 and spectroscopy targeting the 74–87 segment—to test how protonation and coil formation sculpt the selectivity landscape in CLCFs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nakamura et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69990e015b97ab4c14ac2e8ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2025.11.1994
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Fluoride Ion Binding and Translocation in the CLCF Fluoride/Proton Antiporter: Molecular Insights from Combined Quantum-Mechanical/Molecular-Mechanical Modeling2024 · 3 citations
  2. 2BPS2026 – Molecular dynamics reveal mechanistic divergence between the two pores of Fluc2026
  3. 3The molecular mechanism of fluoride export by the eukaryotic fluoride channel FEX2025 · 1 citations
  4. 4BPS2026 – Structural basis of uncoupling in a CLC transporter2026
  5. 5Voltage‐dependent and ‐independent titration of specific residues accounts for complex gating of a ClC chloride channel by extracellular protons2009 · 70 citations