PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 2026Discover Global Society2 citationsOpen Access

Indigenous knowledge for innovation and sustainable livelihood in Ghana’s informal economy

LALinda Anane-DonkorDDDe-Graft Johnson DeiPOPatience Emefa Dzandza Ocloo

Key Points

  • The study aims to examine how Indigenous Knowledge (IK) contributes to innovation and sustainable development in Ghana's informal sector.
  • Utilized a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design
  • Collected quantitative data from 300 informal-sector participants
  • Conducted 30 qualitative interviews with knowledge custodians and stakeholders
  • 90.38% of participants reported a strong reliance on Indigenous Knowledge
  • 84.63% indicated IK aided in developing new or improved products and services
  • Socioeconomic analysis showed IK enhances food security (mean = 84.75%) and community well-being

Abstract

This study examines the systematic use of Indigenous Knowledge (IK) to foster innovation and sustainable development in Ghana’s informal sector. Employing a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design, quantitative data were collected from 300 informal-sector participants in Ghana, supplemented by 30 qualitative interviews with principal knowledge custodians and stakeholders. Quantitative results show a strong reliance on IK (90.38%). IK was shown to have a significant effect on innovation outcomes: 84.63% said it helped them develop new or better products and services, and 84.13% said it helped them develop creative solutions to problems. Apprenticeship and the utilization of libraries, archives, and museums have been identified as the most effective strategies for preserving IK (mean = 84.13%), succeeded by storytelling and knowledge recognition mechanisms (mean = 82.25%). Socioeconomic analysis indicated that IK significantly enhances food security, health, and community well-being (mean = 84.75%) and promotes environmental sustainability through resource conservation and waste reduction (means = 77.57% and 76.13%, respectively). The most important problems were a lack of government and institutional support (mean = 86.00%) and a lack of integration with modern technologies (mean = 62.13%). The study provides substantial empirical evidence that IK is a crucial yet insufficiently supported catalyst for grassroots innovation and sustainable livelihoods, underscoring the need for intentional policy integration into Ghana’s national innovation and development frameworks.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Anane-Donkor et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69994ba9873532290d01fbd7https://doi.org/10.1007/s44282-026-00352-3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Sustainability and development of EWE communities in Ghana through indigenous knowledge management practices2024 · 7 citations
  2. 2Traditional ecological knowledge in restoration ecology: a call to listen deeply, to engage with, and respect Indigenous voices2021 · 115 citations
  3. 3Drivers, barriers and impacts of digitalisation in rural areas from the viewpoint of experts2022 · 166 citations
  4. 4Assessing the ecological impacts of transportation infrastructure development: A reconnaissance study of the Standard Gauge Railway in Kenya2021 · 46 citations
  5. 5Environment Governance, Sustainable Livelihood and Indigenous Knowledge in Ethnic Tourism Villages of China2021 · 7 citations