PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 2026Child & Youth Care Forum0 citationsOpen Access

Beyond Organizing Structures: Necessary Conditions to Provide Integrated Care for Youth at-Risk in Practice

LVLaura C. M. VeermanLNLaura NooteboomRVR. R. J. M. Vermeiren

Key Points

  • The aim is to identify conditions necessary for providing integrated care to youth at-risk as perceived by various stakeholders.
  • Conducted 31 semi-structured interviews with professionals, organizational representatives, and policymakers.
  • Performed seven observations of multidisciplinary case discussions to support findings.
  • Utilized a grounded-theory approach for data analysis.
  • Identified shared responsibility, care coordination, and professional autonomy as key conditions for integrated care.
  • Stakeholders indicated that lacking these conditions leads to challenges in collaboration and care delivery.
  • Found that deficiencies in one condition can negatively impact the others, affecting overall care quality.

Abstract

Youth at-risk face multiple and severe problems across various life domains and poses significant risks to themselves and others. The high-risk and high-pressure circumstances and unique needs of youth at-risk make providing integrated care for these youth challenging yet even more crucial. Integrated care refers to coherent, coordinated, and continuous support across services and sectors. This qualitative study explores the conditions necessary for providing integrated care for youth at-risk according to professionals, organizational representatives, and policymakers. Using a grounded-theory approach, we conducted 31 semi-structured interviews with professionals, organizational representatives, and policymakers across four Dutch youth-care regions. Seven observations of multidisciplinary case discussions were used to support triangulation. The study was co-created with stakeholders, including a youth representative who reflected on the findings. The iterative grounded theory analysis suggests that shared responsibility, shared care coordination, and professional autonomy are key conditions according to stakeholders. Stakeholders perceived that when one of these conditions was lacking, collaboration challenges and stagnation and insufficiency in care were more likely to occur. Stakeholders perceivedthat these conditions mutually influenced one another, such that deficits in one condition can undermine the others. According to stakeholders, providing integrated care in high-risk contexts involves continuous alignment, collective decision-making, and flexibility among professionals and organizations. Attention to these conditions may help support integrated care practices for youth at-risk.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Veerman et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69994ba9873532290d01fd7ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-026-09929-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1How to discuss transferability of qualitative research in health professions education2024 · 114 citations
  2. 2A qualitative analysis of implementing shared decision making in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services in the United Kingdom: Stages and facilitators2014 · 63 citations
  3. 3Developing a Logic Model for the Triple‐C Intervention: A Practice‐Derived Intervention to Support People with Intellectual Disability and Challenging Behavior2020 · 22 citations
  4. 4Methodological issues in grounded theory2000 · 637 citations
  5. 5Implementation and effects of a service coordination program for youths and their families in complex situations: A mixed evaluation design2008 · 10 citations