PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 2026Patient Preference and Adherence0 citationsOpen Access

Preferences of Patients and Cardiologists Regarding Pacemaker Characteristics in Spain: A Discrete Choice Experiment

FFFrancisco García FernándezMAMaría Fidalgo AndrésMOMaria Álvarez Orozco

Key Result

MRI compatibility and battery longevity were the most important pacemaker characteristics for both patients (28.1% and 22.6%) and cardiologists (25.1% and 23.8%) in Spain.

Key Points

  • The research aims to understand the preferences patients and cardiologists have for specific characteristics of pacemakers.
  • Observational, cross-sectional, descriptive study design
  • Discrete choice experiment informed by literature review and patient focus group
  • Involvement of a scientific committee for study design
  • MRI compatibility is the most important characteristic for both groups (P: 28.1%, C: 25.1%)
  • Battery longevity is also highly valued (P: 22.6%, C: 23.8%)
  • Patients prioritize pacemaker size (P: 19.1%) while cardiologists emphasize the type of follow-up (C: 21.1%)
  • Safety metrics, such as post-implantation infection rates, are critical for cardiologists (19.39%).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=42)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

What are the most valued pacemaker characteristics according to patients and cardiologists?

P
Population
84 participants in Spain, comprising 42 patients (aged ≥18 years implanted with a pacemaker for ≥12 months, mean age 64.5, 66.7% male) and 42 cardiologists (≥1 year experience in pacemaker implantation/follow-up, mean age 47.3, 64.3% male).
I
Intervention
Discrete choice experiment evaluating preferences for pacemaker characteristics (e.g., MRI compatibility, battery longevity, size, follow-up type, safety, technical aspects).
O
Outcome
Relative importance (RI) of specific pacemaker characteristics.patient reported

Both patients and cardiologists prioritize MRI compatibility and battery longevity when selecting a pacemaker, though patients value smaller size while cardiologists emphasize follow-up type and safety features.

Main Result

Effect estimate: Relative importance: Patients MRI compatibility 28.1%, Cardiologists MRI compatibility 25.1%; Patients battery longevity 22.6%, Cardiologists 23.8%

Absolute Event Rate: 28.1% vs 25.1%

Limitations

  • This was a cross-sectional observational study limited to self-reported preferences in a discrete choice experiment, which may not reflect real-world decisions.
  • Sample size was small (42 patients, 42 cardiologists) and may limit generalizability.
  • The patient sample was younger than the national pacemaker registry population, limiting representativeness.
  • The study was conducted exclusively within the Spanish public healthcare system, limiting generalizability to other countries or healthcare settings.
  • Selection bias may exist due to voluntary participation and electronic survey format.
  • Some complex attributes may have been difficult for patients to fully understand despite adaptation efforts.
  • Younger patient sample compared to national registry, likely reflecting a selection effect inherent to preference-based studies using self-administered electronic questionnaires
  • Mixed logit model did not converge for the cardiologist sample due to the combination of sample size and model complexity

Abstract

Purpose: A better understanding of the preferences of patients and cardiologists for pacemaker characteristics is essential for advancing patient-centered care. We therefore aimed to identify and quantify the preference that patients and cardiologists assign to specific characteristics. Patients and Methods: We conducted an observational, cross-sectional, descriptive study based on a discrete choice experiment (DCE). The design was informed by a literature review, a patient focus group, and a scientific committee. Results: A total of 42 patients (66.7% male, mean SD age 64.2 12.1 years) and 42 cardiologists (64.3% male, mean age 47.3 9.3 years) participated in the study. For both patients (P) and cardiologists (C), the most important characteristics of pacemakers (higher relative importance, RI) are MRI compatibility (P: 28.1%; C: 25.1%) and battery longevity (P: 22.6%; C: 23.8%). The type of follow-up is more highly valued by cardiologists than by patients (P: 10.2%; C: 21.1%), whereas pacemaker size is prioritized by patients (P: 19.1%; C: 7.7%). From the cardiologists’ perspective, safety (12-month post-implantation infection rate: 19.39%) and technical aspects such as conduction system pacing (CSP) (15.14%), algorithms for minimizing unnecessary right ventricular stimulation (9.43%), and programming modes (9.11%) are also important decision drivers. Conclusion: MRI compatibility and battery longevity are key factors for both patients and cardiologists in decision-making. Patients also prioritize generator size and replacement processes, while cardiologists additionally focus on safety (infection rates) and technical aspects (CSP and algorithms to reduce unnecessary right ventricular stimulation). Plain Language Summary: Pacemakers help control abnormal heart rhythms. These devices differ in several features, and both patients and cardiologists may value them differently. This study explored which pacemaker characteristics are most important to patients and cardiologists. Forty-two patients with pacemakers and forty-two cardiologists participated in a survey that asked them to choose between different device options. Both groups agreed that MRI compatibility (being safe for magnetic resonance scans) and battery longevity were the most valued characteristics. Patients gave greater importance to the size of the device, preferring smaller generators, while cardiologists placed more value on how follow-up is performed after implantation. Cardiologists also emphasized safety, such as lowering infection risk after the procedure, and technical aspects, including conduction system pacing and algorithms that help reduce unnecessary right ventricular stimulation. Overall, the study shows that patients and cardiologists share similar priorities regarding MRI compatibility and battery life, but differ in their focus on other features. Recognizing these differences can help improve communication and support shared decision-making when selecting a pacemaker, ensuring that treatment choices better reflect what matters most to patients. Keywords: pacemaker, preferences, discrete choice experiment

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fernández et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Adult patients aged ≥18 years with implanted pacemakers (conventional or leadless) for at least 12 months in Spain (n=42). Pacemaker characteristics (MRI compatibility, battery longevity, size, follow-up type, safety and technical features) vs. Not applicable - Discrete Choice Experiment comparing preferences was evaluated on Preferences for pacemaker characteristics measured by relative importance percentages in a discrete choice experiment (Relative importance: Patients MRI compatibility 28.1%, Cardiologists MRI compatibility 25.1%; Patients battery longevity 22.6%, Cardiologists 23.8%). MRI compatibility and battery longevity were the most important pacemaker characteristics for both patients (28.1% and 22.6%) and cardiologists (25.1% and 23.8%) in Spain.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69994c01873532290d020366https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s575656
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper