PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 2026Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society0 citationsOpen Access

Direct contact binary planetesimal formation from gravitational collapse

JBJackson BarnesDND. NossSJSeth A Jacobson

Key Points

  • The study aims to investigate how bilobate contact binary planetesimals form through gravitational collapse.
  • Utilized soft-sphere discrete element method (SSDEM) for simulations.
  • Examined a variety of shapes formed by planetesimal aggregates.
  • Focused on the formation process of contact binaries in the context of the Kuiper belt.
  • Simulations reveal planetesimals can form as bilobate contact binaries.
  • Supports the hypothesis that Arrokoth formed directly from gravitational collapse.
  • Indicates the significance of their shapes for understanding early planet formation.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Bilobate contact binaries comprise a significant fraction of the relict Kuiper belt, which includes the exemplary contact binary (486958) Arrokoth. The surfaces of its lobes contain similar amounts of highly volatile chemical species and few craters, indicating formation in a homogeneous and gentle environment. Arrokoth’s bilobate shape was initially hypothesized to have formed via the direct gravitational collapse of a pebble cloud in the Solar system’s protoplanetary disc. However, alternative hypotheses have proposed that Arrokoth may be the result of binary planetesimal formation and the subsequent dynamical evolution of the binary components into contact through external perturbations over long time-scales. Here, we show that contact binary planetesimals like Arrokoth can form directly from the gravitational collapse of pebble clouds. We used a soft-sphere discrete element method (SSDEM) to discover that planetesimals form a wide variety of shapes, including bilobate contact binaries. This method creates planetesimals as particle-aggregates with particles resting upon each other’s surfaces via mutual surface penetration. The formation of contact binaries in our simulations strengthens the hypothesis that Arrokoth, and perhaps many other contact binaries in the Kuiper belt, formed directly as bilobate objects from gravitational collapse, and so their shapes and surfaces record the era of planet formation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Barnes et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69994cb3873532290d02167ehttps://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stag002
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Properties and Origin of Kuiper Belt Object Arrokoth's Large Mounds2023 · 7 citations
  2. 2Collisions of Small Kuiper Belt Objects With (486958) Arrokoth: Implications for Its Spin Evolution and Bulk Density2021 · 11 citations
  3. 3The solar nebula origin of (486958) Arrokoth, a primordial contact binary in the Kuiper Belt2020 · 113 citations
  4. 4Snow Crash: Compaction Craters on (486958) Arrokoth and Other Small KBOs, With Implications2022 · 9 citations
  5. 5The wide-binary origin of (2014) MU69-like Kuiper belt contact binaries2020 · 27 citations