PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 20260 citationsOpen Access

The Economics of Evil: Regime Selection in Illicit Organization under Enforcement, Observability, and AI-Enabled Coordination

View Full Paper
RKRei Kumaki

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a framework for understanding how illicit organizations select their regimes based on varying constraints and enforcement.
  • Developed an endogenous regime-selection framework modeling behavioral shifts of criminal structures.
  • Distinguished three regimes: branded hierarchies, debranded networks, and anonymous task systems.
  • Explored the impacts of public brand capital and governance-mode shifts on organizational transitions.
  • Identified mechanisms driving transitions between different organizational regimes.
  • Found that reduced observability leads to weakened targeted interventions.
  • Highlighted the role of AI in lowering costs related to modular task execution.

Abstract

Preprint v1.0. This paper develops an endogenous regime-selection framework for illicit organization under enforcement, labor-market, and observability constraints. Criminal structures are modeled as institutional regimes selected under parameter shifts rather than as fixed "types." The model distinguishes three stylized regimes: (H) branded hierarchies, (D) debranded networks, and (A) anonymous task systems. Two mechanisms drive transitions: (i) a sign flip in public brand capital when affiliation penalties rise, and (ii) a governance-mode shift toward coercion when organizational horizons shorten. We additionally formalize a taboo–opacity paradox: reduced institutional observability weakens targeted intervention and can select for more fragmented, less governable forms. AI is modeled at a high level as a coordination-friction parameter that lowers certain costs of modular task execution while shifting enforcement and verification constraints. The objective is intervention and measurement design—reducing recruitment and preserving governability—rather than operational optimization. Dual-use and safety note: This preprint is intended for measurement and prevention design and does not provide operational guidance for illicit activity. Series: Economics of Evil (EoE) Research Program.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rei Kumaki (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69994cd2873532290d021987https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18692792
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The political economy of criminal governance2024 · 17 citations
  2. 2Optimal Regulatory Enforcement2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3The Intelligence Explosion That Will Calcify: Extended Phenotype Theory, Asymmetric Intentionality, and the Evolutionary Pathologies of Agent Institutions2026
  4. 4Criminal Governance and Optimal Enforcement in Crime Chains2025
  5. 5Convergent Institutional Evolution: Organized Crime as Natural Experiment for the Extended Phenotype Theory of Law2026