PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 2026Ratio0 citationsOpen Access

A Hyporeflective Response to the Absurd

View Full Paper
THThom Hamer

Key Points

  • The paper examines whether minimizing awareness of life's absurdity can be a rational response to its inherent disappointments.
  • Presents the argument from irremediability to support hyporeflectivism.
  • Addresses and evaluates three main objections to hyporeflectivism.
  • Analyzes the consequences of adopting a hyporeflective approach.
  • Hyporeflectivism may help mitigate negative feelings associated with unmet desires.
  • Three objections raise challenges for hyporeflectivism's robustness.
  • The pyrrhic objection highlights potential emotional costs of minimizing awareness.

Abstract

ABSTRACT If life is absurd in that we cannot help but desire the unattainable, then there is prima facie reason to lament the absurd whenever we are confronted with it. This is an intuitive idea: it is fitting to be disappointed by what is essentially disappointing. But if there is nothing we can do about the absurdity of life, we may have reason to minimize awareness of it. My paper explores this hyporeflective response. I present an initial case for hyporeflectivism—what I call the argument from irremediability . I proceed to argue that the hyporeflectivist can overcome three difficulties (the unavoidability objection , the involuntarist objection , and the truthfulness objection ). They are hard‐pressed, however, to overcome the pyrrhic objection : in avoiding the negatively evaluative feelings associated with a desire for the unattainable, we may lose more than we gain.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Thom Hamer (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69994cdf873532290d021bb1https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.70021
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper