PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 2026European Journal of Pediatrics0 citationsOpen Access

Clindamycin and intravenous immunoglobulins in pediatric invasive group A streptococcal disease: what is the evidence?

EKE van KempenAMAnnika MalmgrenKEKristina Elfving

Key Points

  • The review aims to evaluate the evidence regarding adjunctive treatments like clindamycin and IVIG in severe pediatric invasive group A streptococcal disease.
  • Conducted a narrative review of existing literature on iGAS treatments.
  • Analyzed small-scale studies and expert consensus on clindamycin and IVIG use.
  • Highlighted differences between pediatric and adult mortality rates in iGAS.
  • Current evidence does not support definitive conclusions for clindamycin and IVIG in pediatric iGAS.
  • Treatment decisions remain based on expert consensus due to limited data.
  • Variability in clinical practices and safety concerns were noted.

Abstract

Abstract Invasive group A streptococcal disease (iGAS) can present with severe manifestations, including sepsis, necrotizing fasciitis, and streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. Although β-lactam antibiotics are considered standard therapy, the role of adjunctive treatments, particularly clindamycin and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), in children with these severe manifestations remains debated. Clindamycin is effective irrespective of pathogen load and is suggested to inhibit toxin production, while IVIG is hypothesized to modulate the immune response through multiple mechanisms, including neutralization of superantigens. The rarity of iGAS in children and the relatively low pediatric mortality rate (2–10%) complicate gathering evidence, with most data derived from small, low-quality studies. Evidence is often extrapolated from adult studies, despite substantial differences in mortality rates (30–80%). In this narrative review, we discuss the available evidence on the use of adjunctive therapies in severe pediatric iGAS and its possibility in guiding clinical management. Conclusion: Current evidence does not allow definitive conclusions regarding the benefit of clindamycin or IVIG in severe pediatric iGAS. Treatment decisions therefore largely rely on expert consensus and individualized clinical judgment. Ongoing multicenter studies, such as PEGASUS, aim to clarify the role of these adjunctive therapies and guide evidence-based practice. What is Known: • β-Lactams are first-line treatment for pediatric invasive group A streptococcal disease (iGAS) .• Clindamycin and IVIG have been suggested as adjuncts in severe iGAS, but recommendations differ, and many countries have no formal guidance . What is New: • This review shows that evidence supporting clindamycin and IVIG in children with iGAS remains limited and is largely extrapolated from adult studies. It highlights variability in clinical practice, safety and cost concerns, and the need for larger-scale pediatric studies .

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kempen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69994d42873532290d021df5https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-026-06797-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effectiveness of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for invasive group A Streptococcus infection: A Japanese nationwide observational study2023 · 21 citations
  2. 2Invasive Group A Streptococcal Infections: Benefit of Clindamycin, Intravenous Immunoglobulins and Secondary Prophylaxis2021 · 36 citations
  3. 3The Eagle Effect and Antibiotic-Induced Persistence: Two Sides of the Same Coin?2018 · 101 citations
  4. 4Improved outcome of clindamycin compared with beta-lactam antibiotic treatment for invasive Streptococcus pyogenes infection1999 · 327 citations
  5. 5Intravenous Immunoglobulin G Therapy in Streptococcal Toxic Shock Syndrome: A European Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial2003 · 578 citations