PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2026Drug Discoveries & Therapeutics0 citationsOpen Access

Three-dimensional imaging provides reliable size measurement of skin lesions associated with vascular anomalies: A comparison with two-dimensional photography

KSKana SakaiKKKayo KunimotoYNY. Noda

Key Points

  • To establish a 3D imaging method for measuring the size of skin lesions associated with vascular anomalies.
  • Utilized 3D imaging for lesion measurement alongside 2D photography by dermatologists.
  • Compared measurements of area, surface area, and volume from both imaging methods.
  • Assessed inter- and intra-rater reliability among operators using both techniques.
  • Both 2D and 3D measurements showed high reliability by various raters.
  • 3D imaging demonstrated superior reliability over 2D photography in measuring lesions.
  • Findings support the clinical application of 3D imaging for lesion assessment.

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) imaging techniques enable accurate quantitative size measurement, and have been used to evaluate treatment effects on skin lesions such as ulcers, burns, and skin laxity. This study aimed to establish and validate a 3D imaging–based method to evaluate the surface area, area, and volume of cutaneous lesions associated with vascular anomalies (VA). We compared measurements obtained from two-dimensional (2D) photographs traced by three dermatologists with those obtained from 3D images traced by three company operators, and assessed inter- and intra-rater reliability. The procedure in the present study involves tracing lesion contours using photographs of VA captured by a 3D camera, followed by 3D processing of the images to measure lesion area, surface area, and volume. All patients provided written informed consent, and the study protocol was approved by the institutional review boards. Both 2D and 3D methods demonstrated high inter- and intra-rater reliability; however, better reliability was observed in the measurements obtained by company operators using 3D imaging. The findings indicate that 3D surface imaging provides more consistent and objective evaluation of lesion size than 2D photography and support the potential application of this method in clinical practice and clinical trials for VA. Accurate quantitative measurement of lesion size as an endpoint may facilitate the development of new treatment options for patients with VA.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sakai et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9ca1482488d673cd2661https://doi.org/10.5582/ddt.2025.01104
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparison of Clinical Estimation and Stereophotogrammic Instrumented Imaging of Burn Scar Height and Volume2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2Topical sirolimus therapy for cutaneous vascular anomalies: A randomized phase II clinical trial2025 · 6 citations
  3. 3Sirolimus treatment for intractable lymphatic anomalies: an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, prospective trial2024 · 22 citations
  4. 4Three-dimensional digital imaging is as accurate and reliable to measure leg ulcer area as transparent tracing with digital planimetry2017 · 13 citations
  5. 5The impact of sirolimus therapy on lesion size, clinical symptoms, and quality of life of patients with lymphatic anomalies2019 · 115 citations