PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2026Perspectives on Politics1 citationsOpen Access

Populism and Queer Masculinities: Hegemony, Hybridity, and Fake Subversion

HAHans AsenbaumRCRenato Duarte CaetanoJRJuliana Rocha

Key Points

  • The article aims to challenge the traditional view of hypermasculinity in populism by examining the role of queer aesthetics in the gender performances of leaders like Trump.
  • Analyzed the gender performance of populist leaders, focusing on Donald Trump.
  • Integrated perspectives from populist research, masculinities studies, and queer theory.
  • Explored the reactions of followers to queer performances.
  • Identified the appropriation of queer elements in Trump's masculinity as a form of fake subversion.
  • Demonstrated that followers appreciate Trump's queerness without fully recognizing it.
  • Highlighted new insights into hybrid masculinities, revealing complicated relationships with hegemonic identities.

Abstract

Current research conceptualizes the gender performance of populist leaders in terms of toxic hypermasculinity expressed through their sexist, misogynist, and transphobic rhetoric. This article challenges and complicates this perspective. As hegemonic masculinities, which formerly gained their power through their invisibility, are increasingly contested, they engage in a strategic hybridization by borrowing aesthetic elements from marginalized identities. In contrast to the established hypermasculinity thesis, we contend that right-wing populists, exemplified by Donald Trump, incorporate queer elements in their embodied gender performances. Trump’s masculinity appropriates the subversive spirit of queerness. It conveys reactionary content through rebellious aesthetics, which results in fake subversion. By drawing together insights from populist research with masculinities studies and queer theory, the article makes sense of (1) why Trump employs queer aesthetics, (2) why his followers appreciate his queer performance, (3) why the queer dimension of his masculinity goes unnoticed, and (4) what new light the case of Trump’s queerness sheds on the concept of hybrid masculinities.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Asenbaum et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9d14482488d673cd2c60https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592725103289
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper