PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2026Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans0 citationsOpen Access

Energetics of the Upper‐Ocean Under Sea Ice: Frictional Dissipation Versus Baroclinic Production

View Full Paper
MGMukund GuptaATAndrew F. ThompsonPKPatrice Klein

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand how sea ice impacts eddy kinetic energy generation and dissipation in polar ocean regions.
  • Utilized a coupled ocean-sea ice model for simulations.
  • Analyzed effects of varying sea ice concentrations (30% to 100%).
  • Investigated mesoscale Ekman pumping and vertical buoyancy fluxes.
  • Assessed the dynamics of individual ice floes and their influence on ocean conditions.
  • Surface dissipation was compensated by 69% to 30% by enhanced EKE production under sea ice.
  • Heterogeneous sea ice melt generated mixed layer eddies, increasing baroclinic production in summer conditions.
  • Distinct patterns of sea ice aggregation influenced by ocean eddies were identified.

Abstract

Abstract In polar regions, the presence of sea ice is known to reduce the ocean's eddy kinetic energy (EKE) by enhancing frictional dissipation at the surface. Here, using a coupled ocean—sea ice model, we discuss a mechanism that can instead increase EKE generation under sea ice and, in our simulations, compensates surface dissipation by 69% to 30% for sea ice concentrations varying between 30% and 100%. Mesoscale Ekman pumping and suction due to the sea ice cover give rise to vertical buoyancy fluxes in the core of mesoscale eddies, leading to rectified baroclinic energy production below the mixed layer. Additionally, in the shallow surface layer (5 m), heterogeneous sea ice melt generates mixed layer eddies that enhance baroclinic production for conditions typical of the summer marginal ice zone (MIZ). EKE dissipation and production are both affected by the dynamics of the individual ice floes resolved in our model, which result in distinct patterns of sea ice aggregation around ocean eddies, a preference for anticyclonic floe rotation in the MIZ, and size‐dependent melt. These results emphasize the tightly coupled nature of ocean—sea ice interactions, and the challenge in capturing them within coarse and continuum‐based models.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gupta et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9d14482488d673cd2cddhttps://doi.org/10.1029/2025jc023026
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A New WENO‐Based Momentum Advection Scheme for Simulations of Ocean Mesoscale Turbulence2024 · 18 citations
  2. 2The role of mixed-layer instabilities in submesoscale turbulence2015 · 164 citations
  3. 3Observed mesoscale eddy signatures in Southern Ocean surface mixed‐layer depth2016 · 69 citations
  4. 4The influence of Antarctic sea ice on glacial–interglacial CO2 variations2000 · 546 citations
  5. 5Increasing solar heating of the Arctic Ocean and adjacent seas, 1979–2005: Attribution and role in the ice‐albedo feedback2007 · 506 citations