PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2026JOURNAL OF ADVANCE AND FUTURE RESEARCH0 citationsOpen Access

Multiple Entry and Multiple Exit (MEME) System in Higher Education: Implications and Challenges for the Integrated Teacher Education Programme (ITEP)

DMDebjyoti MondalJSJ SinghSHSarmin Hena

Key Points

  • The research examines the MEME framework's implications for ITEP and its potential to transform higher education.
  • Analysis of key concepts and structural features of the MEME framework
  • Evaluation of policy guidelines under NEP 2020
  • Assessment of challenges in implementation
  • MEME framework promotes flexibility and learner choice in higher education.
  • Challenges identified include academic continuity and credit transfer issues.
  • Recommendations provided to enhance the quality and inclusiveness of teacher education programs.

Abstract

A future-ready education system demands flexibility, choice and learning pathways that empower every student to thrive. The traditional higher education system in India has followed a rigid, linear structure that offers limited flexibility and restricts students from exploring diverse learning pathways. The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 introduces the Multiple Entry and Multiple Exit (MEME) framework to address these limitations by promoting flexibility, multidisciplinary learning, and lifelong education. Supported by mechanisms, the Academic Bank of Credits (ABC) MEME allows students to pause, leave, or rejoin their programmes while earning recognized qualifications at different stages. Within this reform context, the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) has introduced under NEP 2020 the Integrated Teacher Education Programme (ITEP), a four-year dual-major programme that combines subject expertise with professional training for school teaching. This paper examines the key concepts, structural features, and policy guidelines of the MEME framework and explores how they align with ITEP. Although the system aims to reduce dropout rates, improve access, and increase learner choice, its implementation faces several challenges, including academic continuity, institutional capacity, teacher-student ratios, credit transfer, and infrastructural preparedness etc. By analysing these issues, the paper offers recommendations to strengthen MEME within teacher education and improve the overall quality, relevance, and inclusiveness of higher education in India.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mondal et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9d14482488d673cd2cfahttps://doi.org/10.56975/jaafr.v4i2.503783
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper