PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2026ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology0 citations

Understanding Inconsistent State Update Vulnerabilities in Smart Contracts

View Full Paper
LLLantian LiYCYuyu ChenJWJingwen Wu

Key Points

  • The central goal is to explore inconsistent state update vulnerabilities in smart contracts and provide insights for developers and tool builders.
  • Conducted an empirical investigation of 116 vulnerabilities in 352 smart contract projects
  • Analyzed root causes, fix strategies, and exploitation methods of the vulnerabilities
  • Developed a proof-of-concept checker to identify issues in popular GitHub projects
  • Identified 11 critical findings related to inconsistent state update vulnerabilities
  • The checker detected issues in 64 GitHub projects, with 19 owners confirming the findings
  • Highlighted the challenges existing detection tools face in identifying these vulnerabilities

Abstract

Smart contracts enable contract terms to be automatically executed and verified on the blockchain, and recent years have witnessed numerous applications of them in areas such as financial institutions and supply chains. The execution logic of a smart contract is closely related to the contract state, and thus the correct and safe execution of the contract depends heavily on the precise control and update of the contract state. However, the contract state update process can have issues. In particular, inconsistent state update issues can arise for reasons such as unsynchronized modifications. Inconsistent state update bugs have been exploited by attackers many times, but existing detection tools still have difficulty in effectively identifying them. This paper conducts the first empirical study about inconsistent state update vulnerabilities ( i.e., inconsistent state update bugs that are exploitable) in smart contracts, aiming to shed light for developers, researchers, tool builders, and language or library designers in order to avoid inconsistent state update vulnerabilities. We systematically investigate 116 inconsistent state update vulnerabilities in 352 real-world smart contract projects, summarizing their root causes, fix strategies, and exploitation methods. Our study provides 11 original and important findings, and we also give the implications of our findings. To illustrate the potential benefits of our research, we also develop a proof-of-concept checker based on one of our findings. The checker effectively detects issues in 64 popular GitHub projects, and 19 project owners have confirmed the detected issues at the time of writing. The result demonstrates the usefulness and importance of our findings for avoiding inconsistent state update vulnerabilities in smart contracts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9d27482488d673cd2e4dhttps://doi.org/10.1145/3798052
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper