PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2026Thermal Science0 citationsOpen Access

Optimization design and performance analysis of a heat recovery and storage system for sports stadiums

XZXiwei ZhongJWJie WangXSXiaojun ShiBeijing Institute of Technology

Key Points

  • The central aim is to enhance energy efficiency in sports stadiums through optimized heat recovery and storage solutions.
  • Constructed a heat recovery and storage system model using TRNSYS and FLUENT co-simulation.
  • Performed layout optimization for key component selection.
  • Conducted multi-operating-condition simulation analysis.
  • Heat recovery efficiency reaches 75.4%-78.6% under normal conditions and over 79% during events.
  • Daily energy storage fluctuation controlled within 5.8%-8%.
  • Heat pump COP varies from 4.5 at 25°C to 2.3 at -5°C, exceeding rotary heat exchangers by 15%-20%.

Abstract

Sports stadiums, as high-energy-consuming public buildings, face challenges such as high energy consumption and low waste heat utilization. This paper constructs an optimization model for a heat recovery and storage system coupled with the building?s thermal environment. Through key component selection, layout optimization, and multi-operating-condition simulation analysis, the system?s energy-saving performance is improved. A 1:1 stadium model was constructed using the TRNSYS and FLUENT co-simulation platform. Verification results show that the deviation between simulated and measured energy consumption is ?5%, and the temperature deviation is ?1.2?C. Simulation data demonstrates that the system?s heat recovery efficiency reaches 75.4%-78.6% under normal operating conditions, increasing to 79.3%-81.2% under event conditions and remaining above 72.5% under extreme conditions. Daily fluctuations in energy storage are controlled within 5.8%-7.6% under normal operating conditions and approach 8% under extreme conditions. The heat pump COP reaches 4.5 at 25?C, but significantly decreases to 2.3 at -5?C. This efficiency exceeds traditional rotary heat exchangers (?60%) by 15%-20%, demonstrating significant improvement. The research achieved the goals of heat recovery efficiency ?75% and energy storage fluctuation ?8%, providing support for upgrading energy-saving technologies in sports stadiums.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhong et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9d3c482488d673cd30a8https://doi.org/10.2298/tsci2601021z
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Case Study of Operating Strategy Analysis of Heating and Cooling Source Units for a Large Sports Center2025
  2. 2A Case Study of Operating Strategy Analysis of Heating and Cooling Source Units for a Large Sports Center2025
  3. 3Thermodynamic analysis of an athlete’s body heat recovery and reuse system2026
  4. 4Efficiency enhancement of complex thermal energy storages under multiple transient loads2026
  5. 5Performance Evaluation of a Centrally Conditioned Classroom Complex with Energy Recovery: Energy and Environmental Analysis2025