PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2026Applied Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Delay Model of Start-Up Loss Time at Signalized Intersections: Distinguishing Human-Driven and Autonomous Vehicles

View Full Paper
YCYan Chen

Key Points

  • The study aims to create a model that quantifies start-up loss delays uniquely for human-driven and autonomous vehicles.
  • Developed an analytical start-up loss delay model for unsaturated and saturated traffic states.
  • Distinguished start-up behaviors of human-driven and autonomous vehicles.
  • Decoupled start-up loss mechanisms and quantified delay contributions through theoretical derivation.
  • Validated model using field test data and compared with existing traffic models.
  • Observed significant differences in start-up response times between human-driven vehicles (average 2.05 s) and autonomous vehicles (0.3–0.5 s).
  • Determined that the ratio of autonomous vehicles negatively correlates with additional delay.
  • Found that rearranging autonomous vehicles in mixed platoons reduces overall delay significantly.

Abstract

To address the travel delay caused by start-up lag in queued traffic at signalized inter-sections and fill the research gap of unseparated start-up loss characteristics between human-driven vehicles (HDVs) and autonomous vehicles (AVs), this study proposes an analytical start-up loss delay model applicable to both unsaturated and saturated traffic states. The model explicitly quantifies queue-length-dependent cascading propagation effects of start-up loss, and integrates vehicle type-specific parameters based on traffic queue theory and mixed traffic flow field observation data. Conventional models are limited by underestimated delay from neglecting platoon-level start-up loss propagation and failure to account for intrinsic HDV-AV start-up mechanism differences; to resolve these, we first distinguished the two vehicle types’ start-up behaviors (reaction time, acceleration, platoon coordination), then decoupled their start-up loss mechanisms and quantified their delay contributions via theoretical derivation, with validation against field test data and comparison with classical Webster and Clayton models. Field results revealed an order-of-magnitude difference in start-up response: HDVs had an average 2.05 s reaction time with large individual variability, while AVs maintained a stable 0.3–0.5 s response; HDV platoons reached saturated flow at the sixth vehicle, versus the third for AV platoons due to consistent acceleration and shorter headways. Model validation showed that under unsaturated conditions, red light duration significantly affects HDV delay, and the AV mix ratio is exponentially negatively correlated with additional delay. Under saturated conditions, green light duration increases start-up loss delay for both vehicle types, yet the growth rate of AVs (3.1–12.3%) is far lower than that of HDVs (18.2–67.5%), and arranging AVs in the leading position of mixed platoons can further reduce delay. The proposed model improves the accuracy of delay estimation in mixed HDV-AV traffic environments, and provides a theoretical basis for the optimized design of signal control strategies and the efficient management of intersection travel delay.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yan Chen (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9d50482488d673cd32dahttps://doi.org/10.3390/app16042081
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper