PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2026Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery0 citationsOpen Access

Preoperative Gemcitabine/Nab‐Paclitaxel With Concurrent Radiation Therapy for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Comparative Analysis With Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy Using Gemcitabine Alone

View Full Paper
HAHirofumi AkitaHTHidenori TakahashiYMYousuke Mukai

Key Points

  • To compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy using gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel versus gemcitabine alone in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.
  • Analyzed 201 patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.
  • Compared outcomes between 102 patients receiving gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel and 99 patients receiving gemcitabine alone.
  • Evaluated CA19-9 levels, tumor size reduction, overall survival, progression-free survival, and recurrence rates.
  • CA19-9 levels and tumor reduction were significantly higher with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel.
  • 5-year overall survival rate was 55.2% for gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel versus 35.4% for gemcitabine alone.
  • Progression-free survival rate was 42.1% for gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel compared to 31.9% for gemcitabine alone.
  • Distant recurrence was significantly lower with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Although NCCN guidelines recommend preoperative therapy for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BR‐PC), it is still unclear which regimen is better. The study objective was to elucidate the prognostic significance of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) with gemcitabine/nab‐paclitaxel (GnP‐RT) compared to gemcitabine alone (Gem‐RT) in BR‐PC. Methods Of 201 patients with BR‐PC enrolled in the study, 102 were receiving GnP‐RT and 99 were receiving Gem‐RT. We evaluated clinical outcomes between these two groups, including CA19‐9 values, rate of tumor reduction, overall (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) rates, and distant and local recurrence. Results CA19‐9 values and tumor size reduction rate after NACRT were significantly higher with GnP‐RT than with Gem‐RT. With GnP‐RT, the 5‐year OS rate was 55.2% and the PFS rate was 42.1%, both significantly better than rates with Gem‐RT (OS, 35.4%, p = 0.006; PFS, 31.9%, p = 0.041). The incidence of distant recurrence with GnP‐RT was significantly lower than with Gem‐RT ( p = 0.018), but the incidence of local recurrence did not differ between the two groups ( p = 0.905), indicating that the better survival with GnP‐RT might arise from a systemic effect of enhanced chemotherapy. Conclusion Enhanced chemotherapy may improve survival in patients with BR‐PC by suppressing distant metastasis through a potent systemic antitumor effect.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Akita et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9d65482488d673cd3357https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.70191
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper