PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2026Cureus0 citationsOpen Access

Integrating Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Into Postoperative Surveillance After the Resection of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Proposed Hybrid Imaging-Molecular Framework

MMMihira MundhavaPJPankaj JangidKJKhushbu Jangir

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess the integration of circulating tumor DNA in monitoring postoperative liver cancer recurrence.
  • Review existing literature on imaging and ctDNA in cholangiocarcinoma.
  • Analyze the sensitivity and specificity of ctDNA compared to standard imaging methods.
  • Identify challenges in using ctDNA for postoperative monitoring.
  • ctDNA analysis may detect cancer recurrence 2-6 months earlier than traditional imaging.
  • Challenges include assay variability and false positives due to clonal hematopoiesis.
  • Proposes ctDNA as a complementary tool rather than a replacement for imaging.

Abstract

Recurrence after curative-intent resection remains common in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and continues to limit long-term survival. Although repeat liver resection may benefit carefully selected patients, this opportunity is often lost because recurrence is detected only after radiographic progression. Postoperative surveillance relies primarily on cross-sectional imaging, which performs well for macroscopic disease but lacks sensitivity for microscopic residual tumor. Consequently, relapse is frequently recognized only after structural visibility, when tumor biology may already be unfavorable. Minimal residual disease (MRD) represents the persistence of viable malignant cells below the threshold of radiographic detection and is increasingly implicated in early relapse. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis enables the detection of tumor-specific genomic alterations in peripheral blood and reflects active tumor biology rather than delayed anatomical change. Across solid tumors, ctDNA positivity has been associated with recurrence lead times of approximately 2-6 months before radiographic detection; however, ICC-specific prospective performance metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values, remain limited and incompletely defined. Important practical challenges include assay variability, tumor shedding heterogeneity in biliary tract cancers, clonal hematopoiesis-related false positives, and uncertainty in managing isolated low-level molecular positivity. Accordingly, ctDNA should be considered a complementary rather than a replacement modality. This narrative review synthesizes current imaging and molecular evidence and proposes a hypothesis-generating hybrid imaging-molecular surveillance framework intended to guide future prospective validation rather than serve as an evidence-validated clinical algorithm.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mundhava et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9d8e482488d673cd3793https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.103966
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Analytical validation of NeXT Personal®, an ultra-sensitive personalized circulating tumor DNA assay2024 · 38 citations
  2. 2Ultrathin Gd-Oxide Nanosheet as Ultrasensitive Companion Diagnostic Tool for MR Imaging and Therapy of Submillimeter Microhepatocellular Carcinoma2024 · 9 citations
  3. 3Circulating tumor derived cell-free DNA (ctDNA) to predict recurrence of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) following curative intent surgery or radiation.2021 · 5 citations
  4. 4Minimal Residual Disease in Myeloma in 2024: Where We are Today2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Current Opinion about Hepatocellular Carcinoma <10 mm2020 · 18 citations