PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2026Family Medicine and Community Health0 citationsOpen Access

Primary care provider and clinic staff perspectives on the collection of demographic and social needs data in primary care clinics across five Canadian provinces

View Full Paper
AGArchna GuptaJOJoseph J. O’RourkeLKLeanne Kosowan

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the challenges and support experienced by primary care providers and staff in implementing the SPARK Tool for data collection.
  • Conducted semistructured interviews and focus groups
  • Involved 49 participants from five clinics across Canada
  • Developed a SPARK Tool Implementation Logic Model to guide the process
  • Key facilitators include leadership support and staff training
  • Barriers faced were technological challenges and privacy concerns
  • The SPARK Tool helped to systematically collect vital demographic and social data

Abstract

Objective This study reports on the barriers and facilitators experienced by primary care providers, clinic staff and clinic leadership when implementing the SPARK Tool to collect demographic and social needs data in primary care clinics across Canada. Design A qualitative process evaluation was conducted using semistructured interviews and focus groups to identify facilitators and barriers to implementing the SPARK Tool, comprising 20 demographic and social needs questions, in primary care. A SPARK Tool Implementation Logic Model was developed to guide the implementation process. Setting The SPARK Tool was implemented over 6 months, from September 2022 to October 2023, at five primary care clinics across five Canadian provinces. Participants 49 participants, including primary care providers, clinic staff and leadership, participated in an interview or focus group as part of this 6-month implementation study. Results Key facilitators included leadership support, the clinic’s context (eg, staff availability and engagement, multidisciplinary teams), staff training and the provision of accessible materials. Barriers involved technological challenges, time constraints, privacy concerns and language limitations. Overall, the SPARK Tool facilitated the systematic and routine collection of demographic and social needs data, supporting individualised care plans informed by a more comprehensive capture of patient needs. The SPARK Tool Implementation Logic Model was adapted based on the findings of this study, which represent the adapted model’s core components, including prerequisites, inputs, activities, outputs and outcomes. Conclusions The study highlighted the potential of the SPARK Tool to integrate demographic and social needs data into primary care workflows, thereby improving individualised care and facilitating clinic-level service planning. It emphasised the importance of addressing barriers to ensure equitable implementation and long-term success.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gupta et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9da0482488d673cd3922https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2025-003686
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper