PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2026Clinical Cancer Research0 citations

Abstract PS2-10-12: Perioperative minimal residual disease monitering using a tumor-informed ctDNA assay in stage II-III breast cancer

View Full Paper
JAJ. AHNNexen (Canada)JJJ. JungEulji UniversityYCY. ChaNexen (Canada)

Key Points

  • This study investigates the role of tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring in identifying minimal residual disease (MRD) in stage II-III breast cancer patients post-treatment.
  • Prospective enrollment of stage II-III breast cancer patients at a single institution.
  • Collection of whole blood at multiple perioperative time points during neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy.
  • Analysis of plasma using a personalized tumor-informed MRD assay to determine ctDNA positivity and concentrations.
  • Among 231 patients, 138 provided evaluable samples with varying ctDNA positivity rates across different time points.
  • ctDNA positivity was significantly associated with breast cancer subtypes, particularly higher in TNBC and HER2+.
  • Recurrence was strongly linked to ctDNA positivity at specific time points, indicating its prognostic value for monitoring treatment response.

Abstract

Abstract Background Tracking minimal residual disease (MRD) via circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is associated with treatment efficacy and recurrence. This study presents perioperative tumor-informed ctDNA monitoring in stage II-III breast cancer (BC). Patients and Methods Patients with stage II-III BC were prospectively enrolled at Seoul National University Hospital (Feb 2023-Jul 2024). In the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) arm, whole blood (WB) was collected at seven perioperative points: baseline (N00), post-cycle 1 (N01), post-NAC (N03), 1-2 months (P00), 6 months (P01), 12, 24, and 36 months post-surgery (P02, P04, P06). In the adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) arm, WB was collected at P00, P01 or post-AC (P99), P02, P04, P06, and 48 months (P08). Plasma was analyzed using CancerDetect™ (IMBdx), a personalized tumor-informed MRD assay. Samples with ≥2 mutations were ctDNA+. Results Among 231 patients, 138 provided evaluable samples (130 in NAC). Median age was 51.5 (range 25-83). Subtypes included HER2+ (41.3%), TNBC (34.1%), HR+/HER2- (24.6%), with 59.4% stage II and 40.6% stage III. The median number of targeted variants was 56 (range 3-100), significantly higher in TNBC and HER2+ than HR+/HER2- (p0.001).In NAC patients, ctDNA positivity was 80.6% (104/129) at N00, 36.5% (46/126) at N01, 20.2% (24/119) at N03, 12.5% (16/128) at P00/P01, and 8.7% (6/69) at P02. In AC-only patients, positivity was 25% (1/4) at P00, 12.5% (1/8) at P01/P99, 25% (2/8) at P02, and 50% (1/2) at P04.Multivariable logistic regression for baseline (N00) ctDNA+ showed associations with subtype (p=0.015), T stage (p=0.025), and histologic grade (p=0.040). ctDNA positivity at N00 was 90.7% in TNBC, 80.7% in HER2+, and 64.3% in HR+/HER2-. Median ctDNA concentration at N00 (PPM) was 5,660.5 in TNBC (range 21.5-270,615.4), 442.9 in HER2+ (3.5-40,818.3), and 184 in HR+/HER2- (8.8-84,892.3), with TNBC associated with significantly higher levels (p=0.015).The pCR rate in NAC arm was 45.0% (58/129). ctDNA positivity after NAC (N01) was 8.0% (4/50) in pCR patients vs 29.4% (20/68) in non-pCR (p=0.003). At the median follow-up of 523 days (range 255-876), five recurrences occurred. All 3 recurrences in the NAC group were ctDNA+ at N03 and non-pCR. Recurrence was significantly associated with ctDNA positivity at N01 (p=0.014) and N03 (p=0.024). ctDNA concentration at P00 (PPM) also significantly predicted recurrence (p=0.001). Conclusions Perioperative tumor-informed ctDNA monitoring reflects treatment response and risk of recurrence in stage II-III breast cancer. Both binary ctDNA status and quantitative concentration (PPM) demonstrate prognostic value at key clinical time points. Citation Format: J. AHN, J. Jung, Y. Cha, S. Heo, E. Kang, W. Chung, H. Kim, D. Bang, S. Song, H. Lee, W. Han, T. Kim. Perioperative minimal residual disease monitering using a tumor-informed ctDNA assay in stage II-III breast cancer abstract. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS2-10-12.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

AHN et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9ded482488d673cd4293https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps2-10-12
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Abstract CT171: Early findings from MONITOR-Breast: ctDNA dynamics during neoadjuvant therapy using an ultrasensitive MRD assay2026 · 1 citations
  2. 2Abstract PS1-13-11: Personalized Whole-Genome-Based ctDNA Dynamics During Neoadjuvant Therapy Across Breast Cancer Subtypes: Early Insights From MONITOR-Breast2026
  3. 3Abstract PS06-06: Analysis of ctDNA for the detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) using a tissue-free, multiomic assay in patients with early-stage breast cancer2024 · 7 citations
  4. 4Abstract PO3-16-01: Personalized circulating tumor DNA assay precisely predicts the response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients2024
  5. 5Abstract PS2-10-19: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a strong prognostic biomarker of minimal residual disease (MRD) using a tissue-free, epigenomic assay in early-stage breast cancer2026