PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2026Modern Rheumatology0 citations

Clinical characteristics of giant cell arteritis with ocular involvement: A single-centre retrospective study

View Full Paper
TKToshio KawamotoMOMichihiro OgasawaraSNShuko Nojiri

Key Points

  • This research aims to clarify the clinical characteristics of patients with ocular involvement in giant cell arteritis.
  • Retrospective analysis of patients with giant cell arteritis at a single center.
  • Comparison of demographics and clinical features between patients with and without ocular involvement.
  • Use of imaging techniques like positron emission tomography and vascular ultrasound for assessment.
  • Ocular involvement was more frequently associated with temporal artery involvement (P=0.013).
  • Patients with ocular involvement had a higher average number of signs and symptoms before diagnosis (P<0.001).
  • The time from ocular symptoms to therapy was significantly shorter for patients with fundus findings (8.2 days) compared to those without (73.8 days; P=0.032).

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To clarify the clinical characteristics of patients with ocular involvement in giant cell arteritis (GCA). Methods This was an observational, single-centre, retrospective study of patients with GCA treated at Juntendo University Hospital between January 2012 and July 2023. The study involved 71 patients, including 21 with ocular involvement: 10 had fundus findings such as anterior ischemic optic neuropathy or central retinal artery occlusion (6 with permanent vision loss), and 11 without fundus findings. The demographic and clinical features of GCA were compared between patients with and without ocular involvement. Results The temporal artery was found to be affected more frequently in cases with ocular involvement than in those without on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (P=0.013) and vascular ultrasound (P=0.02). The average number of signs and symptoms observed before diagnosis was higher in patients with ocular involvement than in those without (P0.001). The period from the appearance of ocular involvement to therapy initiation was shorter in patients with fundus findings than in those without (8.2 vs. 73.8 days; P=0.032). Conclusions Early imaging and early consultation with an ophthalmologist are important, as ocular involvement with fundus findings tended to occur earlier in GCA patients than without fundus findings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kawamoto et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9ded482488d673cd4348https://doi.org/10.1093/mr/roag013
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Optical coherence tomography angiography findings in patients affected by giant cell arteritis, with and without ocular involvement: a pilot study2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2Case Report: A rare case of ocular giant cell arteritis with bilateral orbital inflammation and diagnostic challenges2026
  3. 3Vision Loss in the Elderly: Focus on Giant Cell Arteritis (Clinical Observation)2024
  4. 4Characterizing the Role of Ophthalmologists in the Care of Patients With Suspected Giant Cell Arteritis at an Academic Medical Center2026
  5. 5An Unusual Case of Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA) Presenting With Bilateral Visual Loss2026