PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Perspective: LINA's testing infrastructure enables AI to take-off in unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)

HBHella Anna BolckJVJanik VollenweiderFMFabian Merkli

Key Points

  • This Perspective examines the importance of LINA's infrastructure in enabling AI for UAVs while addressing regulatory challenges.
  • Analyzed key AI technologies for aerial autonomy
  • Discussed early applications in unmanned aviation
  • Examined regulatory obstacles for BVLOS operations
  • Proposed updates to traditional risk assessment approaches
  • Introduced LINA as a testing and validation platform
  • Identified the need for systematic evidence generation under safety-critical conditions
  • Highlighted LINA's role in building trust among regulators and the public
  • Argued for the integration of adaptive, data-driven systems
  • Showcased LINA's potential as a sandbox for regulatory learning and innovation

Abstract

The development of autonomous aerial robots capable of safely navigating complex real-world environments without or with little human intervention represents a major milestone in robotics and artificial intelligence (AI). While rapid advances in AI-enabled decision-making, sensing, and control systems are unlocking new capabilities for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), their translation into safe and scalable real-life applications remains a major challenge. In this Perspective, we examine key AI technologies relevant to aerial autonomy and discuss early application scenarios in unmanned aviation and airspace management, with a focus on their assurance-relevant properties. We analyze regulatory obstacles that limit deployment, particularly for AI-enabled and beyond-visual-line-of-sight (BVLOS) operations, and highlight why traditional risk assessment and certification approaches are need to be updated to account for adaptive, data-driven systems. Building on this analysis, we argue that testing infrastructure must be understood as a core scientific instrument, enabling systematic evidence generation under realistic and safety-critical conditions, validating autonomous functions, ensuring safety, and building trust among regulators and the public. As a concrete example, we introduce LINA, a scientifically-grounded, integrated experimentation and validation platform in Switzerland designed to support iterative, regulator-aware development of autonomous systems across technology readiness levels. We highlight how LINA function as sandbox for system-level science, regulatory learning, and trust building, thereby enabling the responsible and societally acceptable integration of autonomous aerial systems and strengthening Switzerland's role in advancing aerial robotics research and innovation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bolck et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9e00482488d673cd45f3https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-35722
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper