PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 23, 2026The Knee0 citationsOpen Access

The role of sagittal tibial tubercle–trochlear groove distance in patellofemoral joint loading: a computational modeling analysis

View Full Paper
SSSebastian SchmidtHeidelberg UniversityCLChilan Bou Ghosson LeiteBrigham and Women's HospitalDFDomenico FrancoCampus Bio Medico University Hospital

Key Points

  • To explore the relationship between sagittal tibial tubercle–trochlear groove distance and patellofemoral contact pressure, and the effects of anatomical variations.
  • Developed a two-dimensional sagittal knee model.
  • Simulated joint movements from 0° to 140° flexion with varying tibial tubercle positions.
  • Altered joint line height and patellar tendon length to simulate anatomical variations.
  • Conducted sensitivity analysis for varying parameters.
  • Posteriorizing the tibial tubercle increased patellofemoral pressure by 29.4% at 0° flexion.
  • Femoral rollback decreased sagittal tibial tubercle–trochlear groove distance by 5.5 mm up to 60° flexion.
  • Patellar height changes affected contact pressure significantly with minimal impact on sagittal tibial tubercle–trochlear groove distance.

Abstract

AbstractBackground The tibial tubercle–trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance is a key metric in evaluating patellofemoral (PF) pathology, with increased values linked to instability and cartilage degeneration. The sagittal TT-TG (sTT-TG), defined as the horizontal distance between the trochlear groove and tibial tubercle in the sagittal plane, may offer insights into PF joint loading. However, its relationship to contact pressure and the influence of femoral rollback, patella height, and joint line height remain unclear. Purpose To investigate the relationship between sTT-TG and PF contact pressure and assess how femoral rollback, patellar height, and joint line height influence sTT-TG and PF loading. Methods A two-dimensional sagittal knee model was developed. Outputs included sTT-TG, patellar tendon angle (PTA), and PF contact pressure. Simulations were performed from 0° to 140° flexion. Tibial tubercle position was varied (±10 mm), joint line height shifted (±10 mm), and patellar tendon length altered (±30%) to simulate patella alta and baja. Sensitivity analysis quantified effects. Results Posteriorizing the tubercle by 10 mm increased PF pressure by 29.4% at 0° and 27.5% at 30°; anteriorization reduced it by 21.6% and 18.2%, respectively. Femoral rollback led to a 5.5 mm decrease in sTT-TG up to 60°. Patella baja increased, and alta decreased, PF pressure by ∼9%, with minimal sTT-TG changes. Joint line shifts affected pressure but not sTT-TG. Conclusion sTT-TG is a biomechanically relevant, flexion-dependent parameter for assessing PF joint loading, but its interpretation must consider patella and joint line height.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schmidt et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699bee1c1c6c6bad5397fe40https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2026.104392
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Radiographic Measurement of Anteriorization After Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy2025 · 4 citations
  2. 2Editorial Commentary: A Posterior Tibial Tubercle Relative to the Trochlear Groove Is Associated With Increased Risk of Patellofemoral Arthritis: The Sagittal Tibial Tubercle–Trochlear Groove Distance2023 · 9 citations
  3. 3Three-dimensional in vivo motion analysis of normal knees using single-plane fluoroscopy2011 · 90 citations
  4. 4Associations between anterior knee pain and 2-year patellofemoral cartilage worsening: The MOST study2023 · 9 citations
  5. 5A mathematical model of the patellofemoral joint1986 · 323 citations