PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 23, 20260 citationsOpen Access

In & At — Perceptual Co-Presence Framework

View Full Paper
KBKhaled Benabdi

Key Points

  • The study explores how co-presence in remote communications can arise through perceptual coupling instead of spatial immersion.
  • Participants engage in remote interactions under three conditions: standard video call, avatar-based VR, and In-At structured interactions.
  • Measures include social presence, cognitive load, interaction synchrony, and subjective ratings of 'being with'.
  • The framework focuses on action–perception loops, timing dependencies, and shared attentional anchors.
  • Stronger predictors of co-presence include synchrony, shared attention, and response contingency versus graphical fidelity.
  • Participants reported higher social presence when interactions emphasized perceptual coupling methods.
  • Cognitive load was reduced in interactions designed under the In-At framework compared to traditional video calls.

Abstract

In-At: A Perceptual Co-Presence Framework The In-At Perceptual Co-Presence Framework proposes that co-presence in remote interaction emerges from perceptual coupling rather than spatial immersion or visual realism. Instead of framing mediated experience as either being “in” a virtual space or being “at” a remote location, the framework argues that perceived “being with” depends on structured action–perception loops between participants. The central claim is that synchrony, shared attention, response contingency, and multisensory alignment are stronger predictors of co-presence than graphical fidelity, avatar realism, or environmental immersion. Co-presence is therefore treated as a dynamic cognitive-perceptual process grounded in interaction timing and reciprocal responsiveness. Research Questions RQ1: Can perceptual co-presence occur without spatial co-location when multisensory contingencies are preserved? RQ2: Do users report higher social presence when interaction is structured around perceptual coupling rather than visual realism? RQ3: Does synchrony of action–perception loops (e.g., gaze timing, response latency, reciprocal feedback) predict perceived “being with” better than avatar fidelity? RQ4: Can interaction designed under the In-At framework reduce cognitive load compared to conventional video-mediated communication? Proposed Experimental Paradigm Participants interact remotely under three conditions: 1- Standard video call (baseline) 2- Avatar-based VR interaction 3- Interaction structured according to In-At perceptual coupling principles (timing dependency, shared attentional anchors, constrained response latency) Measures • Social Presence (e.g., Networked Minds Questionnaire) • Cognitive Load (NASA-TLX) • Interaction Synchrony (latency and temporal coupling metrics) • Subjective “being with” rating Hypothesis Perceptual coupling strength will predict perceived co-presence more reliably than spatial immersion or visual realism. Open-access preprint: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18627794 Research Domains: - Cognitive Science - Cognition and Perception - Human-Computer Interaction - Virtual Reality - Social Presence Research - Telepresence Systems - Remote Collaboration

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Khaled Benabdi (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699bee551c6c6bad5397fecchttps://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/mbsh8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper