• CuO and Pt–Pd catalysts were evaluated under artificial and real biomass flue gas • Real flue gas tests revealed strong effects of fuel type and ageing on catalyst activity • CuO-based catalysts showed competitive CO oxidation at high operating temperatures • Pt–Pd catalyst exhibited superior stability during prolonged wood combustion • Results support catalyst selection for emission control in household biomass heating Biomass combustion offers a renewable and decentralised source of thermal energy; however, it remains a major contributor to local air pollution, particularly carbon monoxide (CO) and organic gaseous compounds (OGC). This study evaluates the performance of a CuO-based monolithic catalysts (CH-03 to 07) and compares it to a commercial Pt–Pd-based reference catalyst (CAT 1) under both artificial flue gas (AFG) and real flue gas (RFG) conditions. Tests included controlled AFG conditions containing CO, OGC and water vapour, as well as RFG conditions during wood briquettes and bioethanol combustion, accounting for thermal cycling and sulphur exposure. Under AFG conditions, CH-04 achieved CO conversion rates close to CAT 1 (64 ± 2.3 % vs. 70 ± 2.2 % at ∼370 °C) and demonstrated hydrothermal stability with reversible performance drops below 10 % in the presence of steam. CH-07 matched CAT 1 in OGC conversion but showed up to 27 % lower CO conversion. During bioethanol combustion experiments, catalyst CH-04 exhibited resilience to sulphur content. However, under wood combustion, CH-04 experienced progressive deactivation (conversion drop from 61 % to 22 %) despite regeneration attempts, while CAT 1 maintained stable conversion (84–95 %). These results support the future potential of CuO-based catalysts as low-cost alternatives in low-sulphur applications, while highlighting the need for further development to enhance durability under harsh operating conditions.
Ryšavý et al. (2026) studied this question.