PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 24, 2026Public Health Reports0 citations

Predictors of Breast Cancer Screening Variability Among National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program Awardees: Provider Shortages and Nurse Practitioner Autonomy

View Full Paper
YBYamisha BermudezMJMiller JmKKKristy Kenney

Key Points

  • The study investigates factors influencing breast cancer screening rates among eligible women in the NBCCEDP.
  • Calculated the percentage of eligible women screened among NBCCEDP state awardees from July 2022 to June 2024.
  • Gathered data on awardee- and state-level predictors from various sources.
  • Estimated two general linear multilevel models with different interaction term inclusions.
  • Average screening percentage among awardees was 9.6%, ranging from 0.5% to 78.0%.
  • Awardees in states with full nurse practitioner autonomy or larger PC-HPSA populations had higher screening percentages.
  • Interaction model predictors explained 59% of variability in screening rates, with PC-HPSA being the largest contributor at 27%.

Abstract

Objective: The percentage of eligible women screened for breast cancer varies among National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) awardees. We assessed the effect of awardee- and state-level factors on the percentage of eligible women screened for breast cancer among NBCCEDP awardees. We focused on primary care–health professional shortage areas (PC-HPSAs) and nurse practitioner scope of practice. Methods: First, we calculated the study outcome, defined as the percentage of eligible women screened among NBCCEDP state awardees during July 2022–June 2024. Next, we gathered data on awardee- and state-level predictors from multiple sources and estimated 2 general linear multilevel models. Models differed only by the inclusion of an interaction term between PC-HPSA and nurse practitioner autonomy. Finally, we calculated marginal and partial R 2 to determine combined and individual contributions of predictors on variability in the study outcome. Results: The average percentage of eligible women screened for breast cancer among awardees was 9.6% (range, 0.5%-78.0%). Awardees in states with (1) full nurse practitioner autonomy or (2) a larger percentage of their population living in PC-HPSAs screened larger percentages of eligible women as compared with awardees in states without full autonomy or with smaller PC-HPSA populations. Awardees in states with full nurse practitioner autonomy and larger PC-HPSA populations screened even higher percentages of eligible women (β = 0.46; P = .02). Interaction model predictors explained 59% (marginal R 2 = 0.59) of the variability in the percentage of eligible women screened among awardees, with PC-HPSA being the largest contributor, explaining 27% of the variability (partial R 2 = 0.27). Conclusions: NBCCEDP awardees can encourage their clinical partners to reach women in PC-HPSAs and encourage strategic partnerships with nurse practitioners to address differences in screening.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bermudez et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699d3fb3de8e28729cf64609https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549261421878
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper