PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 24, 20261 citationsOpen Access

Machine Learning-Based Classification of Vibration Patterns Under Multiple Excitation Scenarios for Structural Health Monitoring

View Full Paper
LBLeidy Esperanza Pamplona BerónMSMarco De SimoneDFD. de Falco

Key Points

  • This research aims to improve the classification of vibration patterns for structural health monitoring through machine learning techniques.
  • Used a two-dimensional convolutional neural network (2D-CNN) for classification.
  • Generated vibration image patterns from scalogram images for analysis.
  • Employed stratified 5 × 3 nested cross-validation to address dataset imbalance.
  • Compared the 2D-CNN with single-sensor scalogram methods and baseline ML models like SVM, RF, and LSTM.
  • The 2D-CNN model outperformed other methods in identifying types of structural excitation.
  • Significant improvements in classification accuracy associated with structural dynamic behavior were noted.
  • The contribution of the Total Energy Delivered by Sensor (TES) feature was assessed for its impact on model performance.

Abstract

Tracking structural behavior is critically important to reduce maintenance and repair costs. Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) aims to evaluate the structural integrity, detect damage or abnormalities, and estimate overall safety. The integration of Machine Learning techniques has significantly advanced SHM by enabling the identification of deterioration patterns through sensor data analysis. This study focuses on classifying different vibration patterns recorded under various excitation scenarios (ambient, transient, and forced) using sensors installed directly on a 3-DoF structure. The proposed approach used a two-dimensional convolutional neural network (2D-CNN) trained on vibration image patterns generated from vibration signal scalogram images. To address dataset imbalance, stratified 5 × 3 Nested cross-validation and multiple performance metrics were computed to ensure robust evaluation. The proposed method was compared with single-sensor scalogram approaches and baseline models, including Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), One-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network (1D-CNN), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) models, incorporating class-weighting strategies. Additionally, the contribution of the Total Energy Delivered by Sensor (TES) feature was evaluated for SVM, RF, and XGBoost models. The 2D-CNN model achieved superior performance in identifying excitation types associated with structural dynamic behavior, highlighting its effectiveness for structural vibration pattern recognition in SHM applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Berón et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699d3fc8de8e28729cf6472chttps://doi.org/10.3390/app16042107
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper