PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 24, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Assessing Human Emotional Responses to Urban Sound Environments: Evidence from Web Questionnaire and EEG Survey

View Full Paper
NZNeng ZhaoWLWeishi LiCZChao Zou

Key Points

  • This study aims to quantify emotional impacts of various urban sounds using an index based on audio analysis and physiological data.
  • Classified urban sounds into four major categories: natural, social, construction, and traffic.
  • Collected 1266 questionnaires from 209 participants via a web-based survey for subjective emotional analysis.
  • Obtained EEG data from 35 participants to assess objective emotional responses.
  • Constructed the CK index using principal component analysis to quantify emotional impact.
  • Natural sounds received the highest comfort rating (3.54) and pleasure rating (3.40) on a five-point scale.
  • Natural sounds showed the strongest physiological response, indicated by a parietal alpha power of 18.44 μV2/Hz.
  • CK values for sound types: natural (8.73), social (9.91), construction (10.20), and traffic (10.29), indicating the emotional impact of each.

Abstract

The dominant sound sources in different urban spaces influence residents’ multidimensional emotional responses, and the interaction of various sound sources across temporal and spatial dimensions forms a complex sound environment. This study aims to develop a comprehensive index to quantify the emotional impacts of dominant sound sources. Through field measurements, this study classified the collected audios into four major categories (natural, social, construction, traffic) and 15 subcategories, with each sound source characterized by SPL and primary frequency. A total of 1266 questionnaires were collected from 209 participants through a web-based survey for the subjective experiment, while EEG data were obtained from 35 participants in the objective experiment. Next, by integrating acoustic indicators, subjective questionnaire responses, and objective EEG data, this study constructs the CK index using principal component analysis. CK provides a single, interpretable score of emotional impact, where lower values indicate greater calm. Results show that natural sounds consistently outperformed the other three sound types, showing the highest comfort (3.54) and pleasure (3.40) ratings on a five-point Likert scale, as well as the strongest physiological response with a parietal alpha power of 18.44 μV2/Hz. The calculated CK values for natural, social, construction, and traffic sounds were 8.73, 9.91, 10.20, and 10.29, respectively. This study contributes to quantifying the emotional impacts of urban sounds and refining noise mitigation priorities using the CK index.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699d3fc8de8e28729cf6486bhttps://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16040874
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper